These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20529731)

  • 1. Understanding the effect of bias in fiducial localization error on point-based rigid-body registration.
    Moghari MH; Abolmaesumi P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1730-8. PubMed ID: 20529731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rigid-body point-based registration: The distribution of the target registration error when the fiducial registration errors are given.
    Seginer A
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Aug; 15(4):397-413. PubMed ID: 21515088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration.
    Fitzpatrick JM; West JB; Maurer CR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Oct; 17(5):694-702. PubMed ID: 9874293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A statistical model for point-based target registration error with anisotropic fiducial localizer error.
    Wiles AD; Likholyot A; Frantz DD; Peters TM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 18334433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volume registration using needle paths and point landmarks for evaluation of interventional MRI treatments.
    Lazebnik RS; Lancaster TL; Breen MS; Lewin JS; Wilson DL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 May; 22(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 12846434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of image registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
    Karnik VV; Fenster A; Bax J; Cool DW; Gardi L; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):802-13. PubMed ID: 20229890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distribution of fiducial registration error in rigid-body point-based registration.
    Moghari MH; Abolmaesumi P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1791-801. PubMed ID: 19884067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Software for image registration: algorithms, accuracy, efficacy.
    Hutton BF; Braun M
    Semin Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 33(3):180-92. PubMed ID: 12931320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners.
    Shekhar R; Walimbe V; Raja S; Zagrodsky V; Kanvinde M; Wu G; Bybel B
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 46(9):1488-96. PubMed ID: 16157532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of the CT component of PET-CT to improve PET-MR registration: demonstration in soft-tissue sarcoma.
    Somer EJ; Benatar NA; O'Doherty MJ; Smith MA; Marsden PK
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6991-7006. PubMed ID: 18029989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Symmetric image registration.
    Rogelj P; Kovacic S
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Jun; 10(3):484-93. PubMed ID: 15896998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum-likelihood registration of range images with missing data.
    Sharp GC; Lee SW; Wehe DK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Jan; 30(1):120-30. PubMed ID: 18000329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient multi-modal dense field non-rigid registration: alignment of histological and section images.
    du Bois d'Aische A; Craene MD; Geets X; Gregoire V; Macq B; Warfield SK
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Dec; 9(6):538-46. PubMed ID: 15897000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of rigid multi-modality image registration consistency using the multiple sub-volume registration (MSR) method.
    Ceylan C; van der Heide UA; Bol GH; Lagendijk JJ; Kotte AN
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(10):N101-8. PubMed ID: 15876660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of anisotropic systematic errors in estimating helical angles.
    Ohberg F
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Apr; 11(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 18297498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 2D/3D registration of endoscopic ultrasound to CT volume data.
    Hummel J; Figl M; Bax M; Bergmann H; Birkfellner W
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):4303-16. PubMed ID: 18653922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An efficient and accurate method for the relaxation of multiview registration error.
    Shih SW; Chuang YT; Yu TY
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Jun; 17(6):968-81. PubMed ID: 18482891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Symmetric data attachment terms for large deformation image registration.
    Beg MF; Khan A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1179-89. PubMed ID: 17896591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On fiducial target registration error in the presence of anisotropic noise.
    Ma B; Moghari MH; Ellis RE; Abolmaesumi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):628-35. PubMed ID: 18044621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction of motion artifacts from cardiac cine magnetic resonance images.
    Lötjönen J; Pollari M; Kivistö S; Lauerma K
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):1273-84. PubMed ID: 16179204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.