These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20529735)

  • 1. An automatic and robust algorithm of reestablishment of digital dental occlusion.
    Chang YB; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Xiong Z; Zhou X; Wong ST
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1652-63. PubMed ID: 20529735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated digital dental articulation.
    Xia JJ; Chang YB; Gateno J; Xiong Z; Zho X
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 3):278-86. PubMed ID: 20879410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An automatic approach to establish clinically desired final dental occlusion for one-piece maxillary orthognathic surgery.
    Deng H; Yuan P; Wong S; Gateno J; Garrett FA; Ellis RK; English JD; Jacob HB; Kim D; Barber JC; Chen W; Xia JJ
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Nov; 15(11):1763-1773. PubMed ID: 32100178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of new approach to digital dental model articulation.
    Chang YB; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Xiong Z; Teichgraeber JF; Lasky RE; Zhou X
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):952-62. PubMed ID: 21764490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reconstruction-Based Digital Dental Occlusion of the Partially Edentulous Dentition.
    Zhang J; Xia JJ; Li J; Zhou X
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Jan; 21(1):201-210. PubMed ID: 26584502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Evaluation of Digital Dental Articulation for One-Piece Maxillary Surgery.
    Wong S; Deng H; Gateno J; Yuan P; Garrett FA; Ellis RK; English JD; Jacob HB; Kim D; Xia JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 May; 78(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 32006486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of a three-dimensional dentition model digitized from an interocclusal record using a non-contact surface scanner.
    Kihara T; Yoshimi Y; Taji T; Murayama T; Tanimoto K; Nikawa H
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 26378085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tooth model reconstruction based upon data fusion for orthodontic treatment simulation.
    Yau HT; Yang TJ; Chen YC
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 May; 48():8-16. PubMed ID: 24631784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic gender determination from 3D digital maxillary tooth plaster models based on the random forest algorithm and discrete cosine transform.
    Akkoç B; Arslan A; Kök H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():59-65. PubMed ID: 28391819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoral Scanning and Setting Up the Digital Final Occlusion in Three-Dimensional Planning of Orthognathic Surgery: Its Comparison with the Dental Model Approach.
    Ho CT; Lin HH; Lo LJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1027e-1036e. PubMed ID: 31033828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup.
    Macchi A; Carrafiello G; Cacciafesta V; Norcini A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 16679200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration accuracy of digital dental models and 3-dimensional computerized tomography images by sequential point- and surface-based markerless registration.
    Kim BC; Lee CE; Park W; Kang SH; Zhengguo P; Yi CK; Lee SH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 20591700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1.
    Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model.
    Gateno J; Xia J; Teichgraeber JF; Rosen A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 12619001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
    Olszewski R; Szyper-Szczurowska J; Opach M; Bednarczyk P; Zapala J; Szczepanik S
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 31778603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of a wax bite wafer and a double computed tomography scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model.
    Swennen GR; Mommaerts MY; Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Lamoral P; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 17538314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
    Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.