These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20529895)

  • 1. SuperTriplets: a triplet-based supertree approach to phylogenomics.
    Ranwez V; Criscuolo A; Douzery EJ
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i115-23. PubMed ID: 20529895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
    Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):2408-2421. PubMed ID: 28873954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PhySIC_IST: cleaning source trees to infer more informative supertrees.
    Scornavacca C; Berry V; Lefort V; Douzery EJ; Ranwez V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():413. PubMed ID: 18834542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of supermatrix and supertree methods for multilocus phylogenetics using organismal datasets.
    Janies DA; Studer J; Handelman SK; Linchangco G
    Cladistics; 2013 Oct; 29(5):560-566. PubMed ID: 34798766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. STELAR: a statistically consistent coalescent-based species tree estimation method by maximizing triplet consistency.
    Islam M; Sarker K; Das T; Reaz R; Bayzid MS
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 32039704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supertrees Based on the Subtree Prune-and-Regraft Distance.
    Whidden C; Zeh N; Beiko RG
    Syst Biol; 2014 Jul; 63(4):566-81. PubMed ID: 24695589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quartets MaxCut: a divide and conquer quartets algorithm.
    Snir S; Rao S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2010; 7(4):704-18. PubMed ID: 21030737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robinson-Foulds supertrees.
    Bansal MS; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Feb; 5():18. PubMed ID: 20181274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Invariant transformers of Robinson and Foulds distance matrices for Convolutional Neural Network.
    Tahiri N; Veriga A; Koshkarov A; Morozov B
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Aug; 20(4):2250012. PubMed ID: 35798684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SDM: a fast distance-based approach for (super) tree building in phylogenomics.
    Criscuolo A; Berry V; Douzery EJ; Gascuel O
    Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):740-55. PubMed ID: 17060196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Triplet supertree heuristics for the tree of life.
    Lin HT; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 19208181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel versus unsupported clades: assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 14668120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets.
    Holland B; Conner G; Huber K; Moulton V
    Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 17366137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Split-based computation of majority-rule supertrees.
    Kupczok A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Jul; 11():205. PubMed ID: 21752249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Performance of Two Supertree Schemes Compared Using Synthetic and Real Data Quartet Input.
    Avni E; Yona Z; Cohen R; Snir S
    J Mol Evol; 2018 Feb; 86(2):150-165. PubMed ID: 29460038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resolution and reconciliation of non-binary gene trees with transfers, duplications and losses.
    Jacox E; Weller M; Tannier E; Scornavacca C
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(7):980-987. PubMed ID: 28073758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods.
    Wilkinson M; Cotton JA; Creevey C; Eulenstein O; Harris SR; Lapointe FJ; Levasseur C; McInerney JO; Pisani D; Thorley JL
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 16012108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
    Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.