These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20530866)

  • 1. A multi-criteria weight of evidence approach for deriving ecological benchmarks for radioactive substances.
    Garnier-Laplace J; Della-Vedova C; Andersson P; Copplestone D; Cailes C; Beresford NA; Howard BJ; Howe P; Whitehouse P
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):215-33. PubMed ID: 20530866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Considerations for the integration of human and wildlife radiological assessments.
    Copplestone D; Brown JE; Beresford NA
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):283-97. PubMed ID: 20530865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context--an overview of the PROTECT coordinated action project.
    Howard BJ; Beresford NA; Andersson P; Brown JE; Copplestone D; Beaugelin-Seiller K; Garnier-Laplace J; Howe PD; Oughton D; Whitehouse P
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):195-214. PubMed ID: 20530867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of risk to wildlife from ionising radiation: can initial screening tiers be used with a high level of confidence?
    Beresford NA; Hosseini A; Brown JE; Cailes C; Beaugelin-Seiller K; Barnett CL; Copplestone D
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):265-81. PubMed ID: 20530864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Issues and practices in the use of effects data from FREDERICA in the ERICA Integrated Approach.
    Garnier-Laplace J; Copplestone D; Gilbin R; Alonzo F; Ciffroy P; Gilek M; Agüero A; Björk M; Oughton DH; Jaworska A; Larsson CM; Hingston JL
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1474-83. PubMed ID: 18550231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context (protect): proposed numerical benchmark values.
    Andersson P; Garnier-Laplace J; Beresford NA; Copplestone D; Howard BJ; Howe P; Oughton D; Whitehouse P
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1100-8. PubMed ID: 19589629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation: developing criteria and evaluating approaches for use in regulation.
    Copplestone D; Beresford N; Howard B
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 20548137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deriving a data-based interspecies assessment factor using the NOAEL and the benchmark dose approach.
    Bokkers BG; Slob W
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007 Jun; 37(5):355-73. PubMed ID: 17612951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
    Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New ICRP recommendations.
    Wrixon AD
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18495983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemicals of emerging concern in the Great Lakes Basin: an analysis of environmental exposures.
    Klecka G; Persoon C; Currie R
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 207():1-93. PubMed ID: 20652664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A probabilistic approach to obtaining limiting estimates of radionuclide concentration in biota.
    Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):75-87. PubMed ID: 12590071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of natural background dose rates for residents of the Amargosa Valley, NV, to those in Leadville, CO, and the states of Colorado and Nevada.
    Moeller DW; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):338-53. PubMed ID: 16966877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley.
    Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17220714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Derivation of a screening methodology for evaluating radiation dose to aquatic and terrestrial biota.
    Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ; Kocher DC
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):41-59. PubMed ID: 12590069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
    Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J; Day P
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.