These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20532866)

  • 1. Mechanical comparison of meniscal repair devices with mattress suture devices in vitro.
    Aros BC; Pedroza A; Vasileff WK; Litsky AS; Flanigan DC
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2010 Nov; 18(11):1594-8. PubMed ID: 20532866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical testing of new meniscal repair techniques containing ultra high-molecular weight polyethylene suture.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Schroeder FA; Aziz-Jacobo J; Sutker MJ
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Sep; 25(9):959-67. PubMed ID: 19732633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical testing of suture-based meniscal repair devices containing ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene suture: update 2011.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Bava ED; Drew OR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Jun; 28(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 22317797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Richards DP
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14716278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures.
    Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R
    Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical evaluation of all-inside 2-stitch meniscal repair devices with matched inside-out suture repair.
    Ramappa AJ; Chen A; Hertz B; Wexler M; Grimaldi Bournissaint L; DeAngelis JP; Nazarian A
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jan; 42(1):194-9. PubMed ID: 24114752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus.
    Kocabey Y; Chang HC; Brand JC; Nawab A; Nyland J; Caborn DN
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16581453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear force at failure and stiffness of all-inside meniscal repair devices.
    Kesto WK; Esquivel AO; Markel DC
    J Knee Surg; 2013 Dec; 26(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 23729312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures.
    Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG
    Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system with vertical mattress sutures and meniscus arrows.
    Borden P; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Pienkowski D
    Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(3):374-8. PubMed ID: 12750129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Biomechanical Performance of the Latest All-Inside Meniscal Repair Devices.
    Barber FA; Howard MS; Ashraf W; Spenciner DB
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3001-3007. PubMed ID: 32315765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Novel Repair Techniques for Radial Tears of the Medial Meniscus: The 2-Tunnel Transtibial Technique, a "Hybrid" Horizontal and Vertical Mattress Suture Configuration, and a Combined "Hybrid Tunnel" Technique.
    Buckley PS; Kemler BR; Robbins CM; Aman ZS; Storaci HW; Dornan GJ; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(3):651-658. PubMed ID: 30624953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All-inside meniscal repair devices compared with their matched inside-out vertical mattress suture repair: introducing 10,000 and 100,000 loading cycles.
    Rosso C; Müller S; Buckland DM; Schwenk T; Zimmermann S; de Wild M; Valderrabano V
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 42(9):2226-33. PubMed ID: 24966304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical testing of a shape memory alloy suture in a meniscal suture model.
    Lamprakis AA; Fortis AP; Kostopoulos V; Vlasis K
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Jun; 25(6):632-8. PubMed ID: 19501294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cyclic testing of 3 all-inside meniscal repair devices: a biomechanical analysis.
    Mehta VM; Terry MA
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Dec; 37(12):2435-9. PubMed ID: 19797615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Load to failure of common meniscal repair techniques: effects of suture technique and suture material.
    Post WR; Akers SR; Kish V
    Arthroscopy; 1997 Dec; 13(6):731-6. PubMed ID: 9442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repair of peripheral vertical meniscus lesions in porcine menisci: in vitro biomechanical testing of 3 different meniscus repair devices.
    Lee YH; Nyland J; Burden R; Caborn DN
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1074-81. PubMed ID: 23475943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Repair Method for Radial Tears of the Medial Meniscus: Biomechanical Comparison of Transtibial 2-Tunnel and Double Horizontal Mattress Suture Techniques Under Cyclic Loading.
    Bhatia S; Civitarese DM; Turnbull TL; LaPrade CM; Nitri M; Wijdicks CA; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Mar; 44(3):639-45. PubMed ID: 26646516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis on biomechanical properties of meniscus repairs: are devices better than sutures?
    M Buckland D; Sadoghi P; Wimmer MD; Vavken P; Pagenstert GI; Valderrabano V; Rosso C
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Jan; 23(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 24841938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2000 Sep; 16(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 10976122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.