179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20532890)
1. Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support.
Samulski M; Hupse R; Boetes C; Mus RD; den Heeten GJ; Karssemeijer N
Eur Radiol; 2010 Oct; 20(10):2323-30. PubMed ID: 20532890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts.
Hupse R; Samulski M; Lobbes MB; Mann RM; Mus R; den Heeten GJ; Beijerinck D; Pijnappel RM; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 23091171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Boetes C; Flobbe K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19418215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standalone computer-aided detection compared to radiologists' performance for the detection of mammographic masses.
Hupse R; Samulski M; Lobbes M; den Heeten A; Imhof-Tas MW; Beijerinck D; Pijnappel R; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 22772149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of soft-copy display supported by CAD on mammography screening performance.
Roelofs AA; van Woudenberg S; Otten JD; Hendriks JH; Bödicker A; Evertsz CJ; Karssemeijer N
Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16132926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decrease in interpretation time for both novice and experienced readers using a concurrent computer-aided detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chae EY; Kim HH; Jeong JW; Chae SH; Lee S; Choi YW
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2518-2525. PubMed ID: 30547203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms.
Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R
Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):192-200. PubMed ID: 12616008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.
Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions.
Gilbert FJ; Astley SM; Boggis CR; McGee MA; Griffiths PM; Duffy SW; Agbaje OF; Gillan MG; Wilson M; Jain AK; Barr N; Beetles UM; Griffiths MA; Johnson J; Roberts RM; Deans HE; Duncan KA; Iyengar G
Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(4):R72. PubMed ID: 18724867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
