These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20533016)

  • 1. [Comparison of the Göttingen sentence test and the monosyllabic rhyme test by von Wallenberg and Kollmeier with the Freiburg speech test : Investigation in a clinically representative group of listeners].
    Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2010 Jun; 58(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 20533016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].
    Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2009 Mar; 57(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 18696020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].
    Kollmeier B; Lenarz T; Winkler A; Zokoll MA; Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2011 Oct; 59(10):1012-21. PubMed ID: 21769581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Application of new speech intelligibility tests in silence for the assessment of acquired hearing losses].
    Sukowski H; Wagener KC; Thiele C; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2013 Jan; 61(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 23223925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].
    Memmeler T; Schönweiler R; Wollenberg B; Löhler J
    HNO; 2019 Feb; 67(2):118-125. PubMed ID: 30519714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experiences with the distorted Freiburg Speech Test--diagnosis and rehabilitation of hearing disorders].
    Dieroff HG; Mangoldt W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):372-8. PubMed ID: 2765049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Test-retest reliability of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Winkler A; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):564-71. PubMed ID: 27286728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in background noise].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Pilnik M; Saager-Post K; Dazert S; Biedron S; Oeken J; Mürbe D; Löbert J; Laszig R; Wesarg T; Langer C; Plontke S; Rahne T; Machate U; Noppeney R; Schultz K; Plinkert P; Hoth S; Praetorius M; Schlattmann P; Meister EF; Pau HW; Ehrt K; Hagen R; Shehata-Dieler W; Cebulla M; Walther LE; Ernst A
    HNO; 2013 Jul; 61(7):586-91. PubMed ID: 23076435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].
    Hoth S
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):540-8. PubMed ID: 27259640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Suitability of speech audiometry study procedures for current demands in clinical and general practice].
    von Wedel H
    HNO; 1986 Feb; 34(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 3957726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].
    Müller A; Hocke T; Hoppe U; Mir-Salim P
    HNO; 2016 Mar; 64(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 26801889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.
    Beattie RC; Raffin MJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 3990262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Calibration of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Holube I; Steffens T; Winkler A
    HNO; 2019 Apr; 67(4):304-305. PubMed ID: 30840090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss.
    Kiliç MA; Ogüt F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15244027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.