BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20533039)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt.
    Denewer A; Hussein O; Farouk O; Elnahas W; Khater A; El-Saed A
    World J Surg; 2010 Sep; 34(9):2204-10. PubMed ID: 20533039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responding to the challenges of breast cancer in egypt and other arab countries.
    El Saghir NS
    J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2008 Dec; 20(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 20571588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening in Rural Iran.
    Zehtab N; Jafari M; Barooni M; Nakhaee N; Goudarzi R; Larry Zadeh MH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(2):609-14. PubMed ID: 26925651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Accuracy and direct medical cost of different screening modalities for breast cancer among Chinese women].
    Kang M; Zhao Y; Huang Y; Li J; Liu L; Li H
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 36(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 24785288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Return on Investment Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening and Downstaging in Egypt: Implications for Developing Countries.
    Skrundevskiy AN; Omar OS; Kim J; Soliman AS; Korolchuk TA; Wilson FA
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2018 Sep; 16():22-27. PubMed ID: 29626738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.
    Wang J; Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Daszczuk AM; Feenstra TL; Pijnappel RM; Vermeulen KM; Buls N; Houssami N; Lu W; de Bock GH
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5437-5445. PubMed ID: 32382844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
    Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost analysis of aggressive breast cancer screening.
    Moskowitz M; Fox SH
    Radiology; 1979 Jan; 130(1):253-6. PubMed ID: 103136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
    Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country.
    Lee M; Mariapun S; Rajaram N; Teo SH; Yip CH
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):127. PubMed ID: 28129762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography and clinical breast examination strategies: a comparison with current guidelines.
    Ahern CH; Shen Y
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Mar; 18(3):718-25. PubMed ID: 19258473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical breast examination in a comprehensive breast cancer screening program: contribution and cost.
    Feigin KN; Keating DM; Telford PM; Cohen MA
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):650-5. PubMed ID: 16926322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
    Nowicki A; Stogowska I
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.