923 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20533635)
1. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of different surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of composite resin to amalgam.
Ozcan M; Koolman C; Aladag A; Dündar M
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 21740243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and microleakage.
Ozer F; Unlü N; Oztürk B; Sengun A
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 11931139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements.
Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG
SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):056, 058-61. PubMed ID: 17624174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage evaluation of core buildup composite resins with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems.
Moosavi H; Moazzami SM; Loh S; Salari S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):009-16. PubMed ID: 20228982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the influence of three different temperatures on microleakage of two self-etch and one total-etch adhesives.
Akbarian S; Sharafeddin F; Akbarian G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 16(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 26057914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems.
Bedran de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.
Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC
SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
