These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2053429)

  • 1. Replacement reasons and service time of class-II amalgam restorations in relation to cavity design.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1991 Apr; 49(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 2053429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cavity design and marginal degradation of the occlusal part of Class-II amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):389-97. PubMed ID: 2288211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reasons for placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Jordan.
    Al Negrish AR
    Int Dent J; 2001 Apr; 51(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 11569662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analyses of long-term clinical behavior of class-II amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1991 Feb; 49(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 2024575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey of amalgam and composite restorations in Korea.
    Mjör IA; Um CM
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 8276514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical variables affecting the marginal degradation of amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):379-87. PubMed ID: 2288210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.
    Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study.
    Zimmer S; Göhlich O; Rüttermann S; Lang H; Raab WH; Barthel CR
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 18833853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
    Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Placement and replacement of restorations by selected practitioners.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 2005 Jun; 50(2):81-9; quiz 127. PubMed ID: 16050086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice.
    Allander L; Birkhed D; Bratthall D
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 2255996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality of routine class II cavity preparations for amalgam.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1989 Feb; 47(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 2718755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.