BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20534929)

  • 1. Misleading Goldmann applanation tonometry in a post-LASIK eye with interface fluid syndrome.
    Senthil S; Rathi V; Garudadri C
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2010; 58(4):333-5. PubMed ID: 20534929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interface Fluid Syndrome Induced by Uncontrolled Intraocular Pressure Without Triggering Factors After LASIK in a Glaucoma Patient: A Case Report.
    Shoji N; Ishida A; Haruki T; Matsumura K; Kasahara M; Shimizu K
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Sep; 94(39):e1609. PubMed ID: 26426645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of intraocular pressure after LASIK by dynamic contour tonometry.
    Liu L; Lei C; Li X; Dong J
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2006; 26(3):372-3, 377. PubMed ID: 16961298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interface fluid syndrome after laser in situ keratomileusis following herpetic keratouveitis.
    Goto S; Koh S; Toda R; Soma T; Matsushita K; Maeda N; Nishida K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1267-70. PubMed ID: 23796622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis on Schiøtz, Goldmann, and Dynamic Contour Tonometric Measurements.
    Sales-Sanz M; Arranz-Marquez E; Piñero DP; Arruabarrena C; Mikropoulos DG; Teus MA
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Apr; 25(4):e419-23. PubMed ID: 26550981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with pneumatonometer.
    Bayraktar S; Bayraktar Z
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 15751244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements with goldmann applanation tonometer, tono-pen, and pneumatonometer.
    Vakili R; Choudhri SA; Tauber S; Shields MB
    J Glaucoma; 2002 Dec; 11(6):493-6. PubMed ID: 12483093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilateral interface fluid syndrome and glaucoma progression after laser-assisted
    Mansoori T
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(2):329-332. PubMed ID: 37602170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
    Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraocular pressure and ocular rigidity after LASIK.
    Cronemberger S; Guimarães CS; Calixto N; Calixto JM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 19820780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(9):3790-4. PubMed ID: 12939293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paradoxical hypotony after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Rehany U; Bersudsky V; Rumelt S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Dec; 26(12):1823-6. PubMed ID: 11134885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Rashad KM; Bahnassy AA
    J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 11471999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.
    Aristeidou AP; Labiris G; Katsanos A; Fanariotis M; Foudoulakis NC; Kozobolis VP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 249(5):767-73. PubMed ID: 20577756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment: a preliminary study in Thai patients.
    Ruangvaravate N; Thuangtong A; Kosrirukvongs P; Prabhasawat P; Booranapong W; Srivannaboon S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Mar; 88(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 15962641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements.
    Duba I; Wirthlin AC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 May; 221(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 15162277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.