142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20534929)
21. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lam AK; Wu R; Wang Z; Woo V; Chan E; Tam K; Chau R; Wong KK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 20362856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intraocular pressure measurement in patients with previous LASIK surgery using pressure phosphene tonometer.
Cheng AC; Leung DY; Cheung EY; Fan DS; Law RW; Lam DS
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Apr; 33(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15807823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of LASEK on Schiøtz, Goldmann and dynamic contour Tonometry.
Sales-Sanz M; Arranz-Marquez E; Arruabarrena C; Teus MA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 256(1):173-179. PubMed ID: 29032414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The preoperative intraocular pressure level predicts the amount of underestimated intraocular pressure after LASIK for myopia.
Chihara E; Takahashi H; Okazaki K; Park M; Tanito M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 89(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 15665345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Zadok D; Tran DB; Twa M; Carpenter M; Schanzlin DJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Oct; 25(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 10511933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann tonometer, I-care pro, Tonopen XL, and Schiotz tonometer in patients after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
Ohana O; Varssano D; Shemesh G
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 65(7):579-583. PubMed ID: 28724814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction.
Chen KJ; Joda A; Vinciguerra R; Eliasy A; Sefat SMM; Kook D; Geraghty B; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 May; 44(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 29685776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].
Kohlhaas M; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pollack K; Sandner D; Pillunat LE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Oct; 222(10):823-6. PubMed ID: 16240277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK.
Wang X; Shen J; McCulley JP; Bowman RW; Petroll WM; Cavanagh HD
CLAO J; 2002 Jul; 28(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 12144232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Change in intraocular pressure in myopic eyes measured with contact and non-contact tonometers after laser in situ keratomileusis.
El Danasoury MA; El Maghraby A; Coorpender SJ
J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 11310772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pressure phosphene tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for measuring intraocular pressure before and after LASIK.
Shemesh G; Man O; Michaeli A; Varssano D; Lazar M
J Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 23(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 17455836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment.
Duch S; Serra A; Castanera J; Abos R; Quintana M
J Glaucoma; 2001 Aug; 10(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11558808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interface fluid and diffuse corneal edema after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Portellinha W; Kuchenbuk M; Nakano K; Oliveira M
J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(2 Suppl):S192-5. PubMed ID: 11316019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK.
Li H; Wang Y; Dou R; Wei P; Zhang J; Zhao W; Li L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 57(10):4180-6. PubMed ID: 27548888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Comparative Study of Rebound Tonometry With Tonopen and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Following Vitreoretinal Surgery.
Grewal DS; Stinnett SS; Folgar FA; Schneider EW; Vajzovic L; Asrani S; Freedman SF; Mruthyunjaya P; Hahn P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():22-8.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26408266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Influence of residual corneal bed thickness after myopic LASIK on intraocular pressure measurements. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry].
Muller L; Kohnen T
Ophthalmologe; 2009 Jan; 106(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 19142646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of intraocular pressures at different points in human's cornea before and after laser in situ keratomileusis with tono-pen tonometer.
Li X; Li G; Liu L; Li J
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2011 Feb; 31(1):128-130. PubMed ID: 21336737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
