147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20535185)
1. Pregnant women deserve better.
Baylis F
Nature; 2010 Jun; 465(7299):689-90. PubMed ID: 20535185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Putting gender on the agenda.
Nature; 2010 Jun; 465(7299):665. PubMed ID: 20535156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex bias in trials and treatment must end.
Kim AM; Tingen CM; Woodruff TK
Nature; 2010 Jun; 465(7299):688-9. PubMed ID: 20535184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanisms, continental approaches, trials, and evolutionary medicine: new work in the philosophy of medicine.
Reiss J; Solomon M; Teira D
Theor Med Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 32(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 21207154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stem cell therapy or snake oil?
Baker M
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Dec; 23(12):1467-9. PubMed ID: 16333280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. China Spinal Cord Injury Network: changes from within.
Qiu J
Lancet Neurol; 2009 Jul; 8(7):606-7. PubMed ID: 19539234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pragmatism, dynamism and flexibility in research and clinical practice.
Acharya G
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Apr; 94(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 25761442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex bias blights drug studies.
Check Hayden E
Nature; 2010 Mar; 464(7287):332-3. PubMed ID: 20237530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Being 'underpowered' does not make a study unethical.
Bacchetti P; McCulloch C; Segal MR
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):4138-9; author reply 4140-1. PubMed ID: 22763861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Are results of large clinical drug trials valid for both men and women?].
Njølstad I; Løchen ML
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 May; 122(12):1210-2. PubMed ID: 12089849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a novel opt-out consent process involving pregnant women.
Lam L; East C
Aust Nurs Midwifery J; 2015 Apr; 22(9):43. PubMed ID: 26449063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In defense of valid design as a policy rule.
Evans EL
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):18-9. PubMed ID: 20526962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reframing the framework: toward fair inclusion of pregnant women as participants in research.
Lyerly AD; Little MO; Faden RR
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):50-2. PubMed ID: 21534152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The end of biomedical journals: there is madness in their methods.
Aickin M
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):755-7. PubMed ID: 16296895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Merging evidence-based and mechanism-based medicine.
van der Wilt GJ; Zielhuis GA
Lancet; 2008 Aug; 372(9638):519-20. PubMed ID: 18707972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Myth of evidence-based medicine for bipolar disorder.
Post RM
Expert Rev Neurother; 2009 Sep; 9(9):1271-3. PubMed ID: 19769442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The common rule, pregnant women, and research: no need to "rescue" that which should be revised.
Kaposy C; Baylis F
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):60-2. PubMed ID: 21534157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Inclusion of children and pregnant women in COVID-19 intervention trials.
Malhotra A; Kumar A; Roehr CC; den Boer MC
Pediatr Res; 2021 Apr; 89(5):1063-1064. PubMed ID: 32688370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [PREFERE - the failure of an (almost) perfect study : Does the human factor interfere when answering highly complex questions?].
Klotz T; Bschleipfer T
Urologe A; 2017 Feb; 56(2):231-232. PubMed ID: 28078422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The ethical urgency of advancing implementation science.
Solomon MZ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):31-2. PubMed ID: 20694902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
