These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20535744)

  • 21. Pilot trials in clinical research: of what value are they?
    Loscalzo J
    Circulation; 2009 Apr; 119(13):1694-6. PubMed ID: 19349331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comment on Lu, et. al. 2004: Analyzing excessive no changes in clinical trials with clustered data.
    Albert PS
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):879-80; author reply 880-1. PubMed ID: 16135045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Order-restricted tests for stratified comparisons of binomial proportions.
    Agresti A; Coull BA
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 8805770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comment on: Assessing surrogates as trial endpoints using mixed models.
    Freedman L
    Stat Med; 2005 Jan; 24(2):183-5; discussion 187-90. PubMed ID: 15688461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On estimating the difference between two probabilities, with special reference to clinical trials.
    Anbar D
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):257-62. PubMed ID: 6871355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.
    Daimon T
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 18201944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A study of spectral integration and normalization in NMR-based metabonomic analyses.
    Webb-Robertson BJ; Lowry DF; Jarman KH; Harbo SJ; Meng QR; Fuciarelli AF; Pounds JG; Lee KM
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2005 Sep; 39(3-4):830-6. PubMed ID: 15990265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of stratified and adjusted trend tests for binomial proportions.
    Leuraud K; Benichou J
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 16025544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Partitioning to uncover conditions for permutation tests to control multiple testing error rates.
    Calian V; Li D; Hsu JC
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):756-66. PubMed ID: 18932135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Letter to the editor.
    Kibria BM
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):235-6; author reply 237. PubMed ID: 15853847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Disease modifying trials in Alzheimer disease: methodological and statistical issues.
    Andrieu S; Rascol O; Lang T; Grandjean H; Vellas B
    J Nutr Health Aging; 2006; 10(2):116-7. PubMed ID: 16554944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methodology for clinical trials in rheumatology: logical foundations.
    Cook RJ; Farewell VT; Gladman DD
    J Rheumatol; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1861-5. PubMed ID: 9330922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How much statistics do we need?
    Bacharova L
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jan; 40(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 16916520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exact, distribution free confidence intervals for late effects in censored matched pairs.
    Daniel SR
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 19219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On determination of sample size in hierarchical binomial models.
    Zou KH; Normand SL
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2163-82. PubMed ID: 11439428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Updated methods for reporting clinical trials.
    Hait WN
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Oct; 11(19 Pt 1):6753-4. PubMed ID: 16203758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Clinical studies between empiricism and biometrics].
    Röding H
    Zentralbl Chir; 1991; 116(12):767-70. PubMed ID: 1833932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exact one-sided confidence limits for the difference between two correlated proportions.
    Lloyd CJ; Moldovan MV
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3369-84. PubMed ID: 17315269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On group sequential designs comparing two binomial proportions.
    Kepner JL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 20077254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How to deal with multiple endpoints in clinical trials.
    Neuhäuser M
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):515-23. PubMed ID: 17109645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.