142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2053657)
21. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
Faggion CM
Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
Morton JP
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Journal policy on ethics in scientific publication.
Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 12514687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How to review a scientific paper.
Tandon R
Asian J Psychiatr; 2014 Oct; 11():124-7. PubMed ID: 25248566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial.
Godlee F; Gale CR; Martyn CN
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 9676667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimizing the three stages of publication bias.
Chalmers TC; Frank CS; Reitman D
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1392-5. PubMed ID: 2406473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of self-citation by peer reviewers in a journal with single-blind peer review versus a journal with open peer review.
Levis AW; Leentjens AF; Levenson JL; Lumley MA; Thombs BD
J Psychosom Res; 2015 Dec; 79(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 26337110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health.
Cantekin EI; McGuire TW; Potter RL
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1427-30. PubMed ID: 2078202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Reviewing an article for Radiología: who and how].
García Santos JM
Radiologia; 2011; 53(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 21924445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [A guide to the peer review of scientific papers].
Giunta RE; Prommersberger KJ
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2012 Aug; 44(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 22836956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A systematic guide for peer reviewers for a medical journal.
Garfield JM; Kaye AD; Kolinsky DC; Urman RD
J Med Pract Manage; 2015; 30(6 Spec No):13-7. PubMed ID: 26062311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Kliewer MA; Freed KS; DeLong DM; Pickhardt PJ; Provenzale JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1731-5. PubMed ID: 15908521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem.
Evans JT; Nadjari HI; Burchell SA
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1353-4. PubMed ID: 2304213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medical journal peer review: process and bias.
Manchikanti L; Kaye AD; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):E1-E14. PubMed ID: 25675064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reviewer status and review quality. Experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Stossel TP
N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):658-9. PubMed ID: 3974642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
