These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20536636)

  • 1. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 20536636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Thomsen H; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1628-39. PubMed ID: 18349255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Mullaart E; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4821-9. PubMed ID: 17881705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of marker-assisted selection under different initial frequency of QTL favorable allele.
    Lu SX; Wu CX; Lian LS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 30(8):750-4. PubMed ID: 14682244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle.
    Hayes BJ; Chamberlain AJ; McPartlan H; Macleod I; Sethuraman L; Goddard ME
    Genet Res; 2007 Aug; 89(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 18208627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.
    Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection on multiple QTL with control of gene diversity and inbreeding for long-term benefit.
    Li Y; Kadarmideen HN; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Oct; 125(5):320-9. PubMed ID: 18803787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linkage disequilibrium and selection response in two-stage marker-assisted selection of dairy cattle over several generations.
    Schulman NF; Dentine MR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Apr; 122(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16130477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTL.
    Zhao H; Nettleton D; Soller M; Dekkers JC
    Genet Res; 2005 Aug; 86(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 16181525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.
    Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superiority of QTL-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Abdel-Azim G; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jul; 85(7):1869-80. PubMed ID: 12201538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
    Luo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Mar; 52(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of genetic parameters for quantitative trait loci for dairy traits in the French Holstein population.
    Druet T; Fritz S; Boichard D; Colleau JJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Oct; 89(10):4070-6. PubMed ID: 16960084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.