2149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20537493)
1. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
Lim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Lee BK; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25499342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.
Fearon WF; Bornschein B; Tonino PA; Gothe RM; Bruyne BD; Pijls NH; Siebert U;
Circulation; 2010 Dec; 122(24):2545-50. PubMed ID: 21126973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with small-vessel disease.
Puymirat E; Peace A; Mangiacapra F; Conte M; Ntarladimas Y; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wijns W; De Bruyne B; Barbato E
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 5(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 22319067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.
Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Siebert U; Ikeno F; van' t Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; Fearon WF;
N Engl J Med; 2009 Jan; 360(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 19144937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy.
Kim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Tremmel JA; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1037-42. PubMed ID: 23078733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid revascularization strategy: a pilot study on the association of robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fractional-flow-reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
Davidavicius G; Van Praet F; Mansour S; Casselman F; Bartunek J; Degrieck I; Wellens F; De Geest R; Vanermen H; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
Circulation; 2005 Aug; 112(9 Suppl):I317-22. PubMed ID: 16159838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
van Nunen LX; Zimmermann FM; Tonino PA; Barbato E; Baumbach A; Engstrøm T; Klauss V; MacCarthy PA; Manoharan G; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; Van't Veer M; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH;
Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10006):1853-60. PubMed ID: 26333474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel disease? A tailored approach based on coronary pressure measurement.
Botman KJ; Pijls NH; Bech JW; Aarnoudse W; Peels K; van Straten B; Penn O; Michels HR; Bonnier H; Koolen JJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Oct; 63(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 15390344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of fractional and coronary flow reserve in predicting myocardial recovery in patients with previous myocardial infarction.
Beleslin B; Ostojic M; Djordjevic-Dikic A; Vukcevic V; Stojkovic S; Nedeljkovic M; Stankovic G; Orlic D; Milic N; Stepanovic J; Giga V; Saponjski J
Eur Heart J; 2008 Nov; 29(21):2617-24. PubMed ID: 18826987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Toth G; De Bruyne B; Casselman F; De Vroey F; Pyxaras S; Di Serafino L; Van Praet F; Van Mieghem C; Stockman B; Wijns W; Degrieck I; Barbato E
Circulation; 2013 Sep; 128(13):1405-11. PubMed ID: 23985788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve guidance for PCI in acute myocardial infarction.
Muramatsu T; Tsukahara R; Ho M; Ito Y; Hirano K; Nakano M; Matsushita M; Shida K
J Invasive Cardiol; 2002 Nov; 14(11):657-62. PubMed ID: 12403892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Zimmermann FM; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Desai M; Oldroyd KG; Park SJ; Reardon MJ; Wendler O; Woo J; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Am Heart J; 2015 Oct; 170(4):619-626.e2. PubMed ID: 26386784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.
Kobayashi Y; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yang HM; Lim HS; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 204():206-10. PubMed ID: 26670174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.
Tonino PA; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Oldroyd KG; Leesar MA; Ver Lee PN; Maccarthy PA; Van't Veer M; Pijls NH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 55(25):2816-21. PubMed ID: 20579537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve.
Koo BK; Park KW; Kang HJ; Cho YS; Chung WY; Youn TJ; Chae IH; Choi DJ; Tahk SJ; Oh BH; Park YB; Kim HS
Eur Heart J; 2008 Mar; 29(6):726-32. PubMed ID: 18308689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
Sels JW; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Fearon WF; Van't Veer M; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 4(11):1183-9. PubMed ID: 22115657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study.
Pijls NH; van Schaardenburgh P; Manoharan G; Boersma E; Bech JW; van't Veer M; Bär F; Hoorntje J; Koolen J; Wijns W; de Bruyne B
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 May; 49(21):2105-11. PubMed ID: 17531660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease: results from the ARTS trial in Israel.
Gruberg L; Milo S; Ben Tzvi M; Lotan C; Merin G; Braun S; Mohr R; Tzivoni D; Bitran D; Beyar R;
Isr Med Assoc J; 2003 Aug; 5(8):539-42. PubMed ID: 12929288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Javaid A; Steinberg DH; Buch AN; Corso PJ; Boyce SW; Pinto Slottow TL; Roy PK; Hill P; Okabe T; Torguson R; Smith KA; Xue Z; Gevorkian N; Suddath WO; Kent KM; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Circulation; 2007 Sep; 116(11 Suppl):I200-6. PubMed ID: 17846304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
