These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20538199)

  • 1. Assessment of disagreement: a new information-based approach.
    Costa-Santos C; Antunes L; Souto A; Bernardes J
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 20538199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general approach to evaluating agreement between two observers or methods of measurement from quantitative data with replicated measurements.
    Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 17698934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing observer agreement in studies involving replicated binary observations.
    Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):757-66. PubMed ID: 17613652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement.
    Henriques T; Antunes L; Bernardes J; Matias M; Sato D; Costa-Santos C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():47. PubMed ID: 23522303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An application of linear mixed effects model to assess the agreement between two methods with replicated observations.
    Roy A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):150-73. PubMed ID: 19127473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement.
    Yi Q; Wang PP; He Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2816-25. PubMed ID: 17985364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and reliability of the General Motor Function Assessment Scale (GMF)--a performance-based measure of function-related dependence, pain and insecurity.
    Aberg AC; Lindmark B; Lithell H
    Disabil Rehabil; 2003 May; 25(9):462-72. PubMed ID: 12745941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of blood pressure measurement quality in the baseline surveys of the WHO MONICA project.
    Hense HW; Koivisto AM; Kuulasmaa K; Zaborskis A; Kupsc W; Tuomilehto J
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Dec; 9(12):935-46. PubMed ID: 8746637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of statistical analysis of cytologic interpretation to determine the causes of interobserver disagreement and in quality improvement.
    Renshaw AA; Lee KR; Granter SR
    Cancer; 1997 Aug; 81(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 9292736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of the concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measures using SAS and R.
    Carrasco JL; Phillips BR; Puig-Martinez J; King TS; Chinchilli VM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Mar; 109(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 23031487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
    Yang Y; Jin Z
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
    Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observer variation in the diagnosis of thyroid disorders. Criteria for and impact on diagnostic decision-making.
    Jarløv AE
    Dan Med Bull; 2000 Nov; 47(5):328-39. PubMed ID: 11155660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of Bayes theorem in the interpretation of subjective diagnostic findings: what can we learn from agreement studies?
    Sadatsafavi M; Moayyeri A; Bahrami H; Soltani A
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 17873264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating health outcomes in the presence of competing risks: a review of statistical methods and clinical applications.
    Varadhan R; Weiss CO; Segal JB; Wu AW; Scharfstein D; Boyd C
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S96-105. PubMed ID: 20473207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) in practice: agreement between observers rating esophageal varices: how to cope with chance?
    Sierra F; Cárdenas A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Nov; 102(11):2363-6. PubMed ID: 17958753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The loss of reliability in data extraction from clinical histories: the source of the flaws and the usefulness of training].
    Gómez de la Cámara A; Ciruelo Monge E; de la Cruz Bértolo J; Serrano Díaz JM; Pato Cour E; Gómez-Reino Carnota JJ
    Med Clin (Barc); 1997 Mar; 108(10):377-81. PubMed ID: 9139144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement for curved data.
    Liao JJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 15796289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].
    Reine G; Lancon C; Simeoni MC; Duplan S; Auquier P
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 14567165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements.
    Rousson V; Gasser T; Seifert B
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3431-46. PubMed ID: 12407682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.