379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20539214)
1. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes.
Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D
Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.
Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the ocular response analyzer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Feizi S; Hashemloo A; Rastegarpour A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5887-91. PubMed ID: 21447674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus?--a pilot study.
Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Morad Y; Hartstein M; Avni I; Zadok D
Cornea; 2009 Jun; 28(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 19421050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of corneal thickness on comparative intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann and non-contact tonometers in keratoconus.
Stabuc Silih M; Hawlina M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Dec; 220(12):843-7. PubMed ID: 14704941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the intraocular pressure measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
Curr Eye Res; 2010 Jul; 35(7):587-96. PubMed ID: 20597645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tonometry in keratoconic eyes before and after riboflavin/UVA corneal collagen crosslinking using three different tonometers.
Gkika MG; Labiris G; Kozobolis VP
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 21574162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Keratoconus With and Without Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments.
Mendez-Hernandez C; Arribas-Pardo P; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Fernandez-Perez C; Mendez-Fernandez R; Saenz-Frances F; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jan; 26(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27661992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas.
Ozbek Z; Cohen EJ; Hammersmith KM; Rapuano CJ
Cornea; 2006 Sep; 25(8):890-4. PubMed ID: 17102662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraocular pressure values obtained by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, and goldmann tonometry in keratokonic corneas.
Bayer A; Sahin A; Hürmeriç V; Ozge G
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(8):540-5. PubMed ID: 20164793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty.
Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
