These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20540683)
1. Measurement of response of pulmonal tumors in 64-slice MDCT. Sohns C; Mangelsdorf J; Sossalla S; Konietschke F; Obenauer S Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):512-21. PubMed ID: 20540683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Automated pulmonary nodule volumetry with an optimized algorithm. Accuracy at different slice thicknesses compared to unidimensional and bidimensional measurements]. Vogel MN; Vonthein R; Schmücker S; Maksimovich O; Bethge W; Dicken V; Claussen CD; Horger M Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):791-7. PubMed ID: 18690578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of unidimensional and bidimensional measurement to assess therapeutic response in the treatment of solid tumors]. Hauth EA; Stattaus J; Forsting M Radiologe; 2007 Jul; 47(7):628, 630-4. PubMed ID: 16440191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of treatment response classifications between unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography. Tran LN; Brown MS; Goldin JG; Yan X; Pais RC; McNitt-Gray MF; Gjertson D; Rogers SR; Aberle DR Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1355-60. PubMed ID: 15596373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical lymph node staging--influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on volumetry and RECIST measurements. Fabel M; Wulff A; Heckel F; Bornemann L; Freitag-Wolf S; Heller M; Biederer J; Bolte H Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3124-30. PubMed ID: 22464844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Size determination and response assessment of liver metastases with computed tomography--comparison of RECIST and volumetric algorithms. Rothe JH; Grieser C; Lehmkuhl L; Schnapauff D; Fernandez CP; Maurer MH; Mussler A; Hamm B; Denecke T; Steffen IG Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1831-9. PubMed ID: 22717124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volume-based response evaluation with consensual lesion selection: a pilot study by using cloud solutions and comparison to RECIST 1.1. Oubel E; Bonnard E; Sueoka-Aragane N; Kobayashi N; Charbonnier C; Yamamichi J; Mizobe H; Kimura S Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 25488429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volumetry: an alternative to assess therapy response for malignant pleural mesothelioma? Frauenfelder T; Tutic M; Weder W; Götti RP; Stahel RA; Seifert B; Opitz I Eur Respir J; 2011 Jul; 38(1):162-8. PubMed ID: 21273389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Follow-up CT measurement of liver malignoma according to RECIST and WHO vs. volumetry]. Heussel CP; Meier S; Wittelsberger S; Götte H; Mildenberger P; Kauczor HU Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):958-64. PubMed ID: 17594629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volumetric evaluation of therapy response in patients with lung metastases. Preliminary results with a computer system (CAD) and comparison with unidimensional measurements. Fraioli F; Bertoletti L; Napoli A; Calabrese FA; Masciangelo R; Cortesi E; Catalano C; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 16683084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor response to chemotherapy: the validity and reproducibility of RECIST guidelines in NSCLC patients. Watanabe H; Yamamoto S; Kunitoh H; Sekine I; Yamamoto N; Ohe Y; Tamura T; Kodama T; Sugimura K; Saijo N Cancer Sci; 2003 Nov; 94(11):1015-20. PubMed ID: 14611681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver: comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines. Prasad SR; Saini S; Sumner JE; Hahn PF; Sahani D; Boland GW J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2003; 27(3):380-4. PubMed ID: 12794603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Marten K; Auer F; Schmidt S; Kohl G; Rummeny EJ; Engelke C Eur Radiol; 2006 Apr; 16(4):781-90. PubMed ID: 16331462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric Versus Unidimensional Measures of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Assessing Disease Response. Lubner MG; Stabo N; Lubner SJ; Del Rio AM; Song C; Pickhardt PJ Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Dec; 16(4):324-333.e1. PubMed ID: 28433601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semiautomatic Analysis on Computed Tomography in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Reproducibility and Prognostic Significance of Unidimensional and 3-dimensional Measurements. Colombi D; Manna C; Montermini I; Seletti V; Diciotti S; Tiseo M; Fontana E; De Filippo M; Silva M; Sverzellati N J Thorac Imaging; 2015 Sep; 30(5):290-9. PubMed ID: 25837590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the response evaluation of cancer therapy according to RECIST and WHO-criteria. Suzuki C; Torkzad MR; Jacobsson H; Aström G; Sundin A; Hatschek T; Fujii H; Blomqvist L Acta Oncol; 2010 May; 49(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 20397778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RECIST and WHO criteria evaluation of cervical, thoracic and abdominal lymph nodes in patients with malignant lymphoma: manual versus semi-automated measurement on standard MDCT slices. Keil S; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Suehling M; Jost E; Mühlenbruch G; Mahnken A; Günther RW; Das M Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):888-95. PubMed ID: 19582654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric response classification in metastatic solid tumors on MSCT: initial results in a whole-body setting. Wulff AM; Fabel M; Freitag-Wolf S; Tepper M; Knabe HM; Schäfer JP; Jansen O; Bolte H Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e567-73. PubMed ID: 23827800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the introduction of minimum lesion size on interobserver reproducibility using RECIST guidelines in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Watanabe H; Kunitoh H; Yamamoto S; Kawasaki S; Inoue A; Hotta K; Shiomi K; Kusumoto M; Sugimura K; Saijo N Cancer Sci; 2006 Mar; 97(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 16542218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]