These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
646 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20540910)
1. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system. Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database. Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination. Lauria A Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms. Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis. Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images. Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views. van Engeland S; Timp S; Karssemeijer N Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3203-12. PubMed ID: 17022213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms. Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views. Pu J; Zheng B; Leader JK; Gur D Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 18383669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process. Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Region for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using MIAS Mammograms. Yoon WB; Oh JE; Chae EY; Kim HH; Lee SY; Kim KG Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5967580. PubMed ID: 27847817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment. Wang X; Li L; Xu W; Liu W; Lederman D; Zheng B Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms. van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method. van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers. Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization. Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software. Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms. Hupse R; Karssemeijer N IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Retrospective analysis of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in full-field digital mammography in correlation to tumor histology]. Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1103-9. PubMed ID: 16021542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses. Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]