These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20541707)
21. Training standards and imaging: will these have any impact on turf wars affecting radiologists? Munk PL; Liu DM Can Assoc Radiol J; 2010 Apr; 61(2):66. PubMed ID: 20303019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Computed tomographic angiography for localizing the site of plaque disruption/thrombus: is detection so complex? Ambrose JA; Srikanth S Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Mar; 4(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 21406660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The incremental value of coronary computerized tomography angiography following invasive coronary angiography with an emphasis on equivocal left main stenosis. Ilia R; Shimony A; Shalev A; Cafri C; Weinstein JM Int J Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 201():119-20. PubMed ID: 26296049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantification of coronary artery stenoses by computed tomography. Achenbach S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jul; 1(4):472-4. PubMed ID: 19356469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Is CT the better angiogram? Coronary interventions and CT imaging. Achenbach S; Ludwig J JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 20129527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Learning curve for coronary CT angiography: what constitutes sufficient training? Pugliese F; Hunink MG; Gruszczynska K; Alberghina F; Malagó R; van Pelt N; Mollet NR; Cademartiri F; Weustink AC; Meijboom WB; Witteman CL; de Feyter PJ; Krestin GP Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):359-68. PubMed ID: 19401570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison of non-invasive electron-beam and multislice CT angiography efficacy for detection of coronary artery stenosis]. Ustiuzhanin DV; Veselova TN; Sinitsyn VE; Matchin IuG; Ternovoĭ SK Ter Arkh; 2008; 80(4):12-5. PubMed ID: 18491573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of 64-slice MDCT in the real world of cardiology: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Sirol M; Sanz J; Henry P; Rymer R; Leber A Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 May; 102(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 19520329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Another Step Forward in CT Angiography. Lima JA JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Mar; 1(2):187-9. PubMed ID: 19356427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of stress testing versus 64-multislice coronary computed tomography angiography in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease diagnosed by coronary angiography. Ravipati G; Aronow WS; Lai H; Shao J; DeLuca AJ; Weiss MB; Pucillo AL; Kalapatapu K; Monsen CE; Belkin RN Am J Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 101(6):774-5. PubMed ID: 18328838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Anatomic and functional assessment of coronary artery disease: convergence of 2 aims in a single setting. Min JK; Berman D Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 May; 2(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 19808586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. Budoff MJ; Dowe D; Jollis JG; Gitter M; Sutherland J; Halamert E; Scherer M; Bellinger R; Martin A; Benton R; Delago A; Min JK J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(21):1724-32. PubMed ID: 19007693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Heart imaging: the accuracy of the 64-MSCT in the detection of coronary artery disease. Alessandri N; Di Matteo A; Rondoni G; Petrassi M; Tufani F; Ferrari R; Laghi A Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2009; 13(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 19673166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic utility of coronary computed tomography angiography: are we looking at the correct outcomes and making appropriate comparisons? Rassi A JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):914; author reply 915. PubMed ID: 19608143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography: it's all about resolution. Achenbach S J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 43(5):840-1. PubMed ID: 14998626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. Sarno G; Decraemer I; Vanhoenacker PK; De Bruyne B; Hamilos M; Cuisset T; Wyffels E; Bartunek J; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jun; 2(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19539260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cardiac computed tomography: a team approach? Mayo JR; Gin K Can Assoc Radiol J; 2010 Apr; 61(2):67. PubMed ID: 20303020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]