695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20541737)
1. Periorbital contact sensitization.
Landeck L; Schalock PC; Baden LA; Gonzalez E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 150(3):366-370.e2. PubMed ID: 20541737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Periorbital dermatitis--a recalcitrant disease: causes and differential diagnoses.
Feser A; Plaza T; Vogelgsang L; Mahler V
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(4):858-63. PubMed ID: 18721191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allergic and non-allergic periorbital dermatitis: patch test results of the Information Network of the Departments of Dermatology during a 5-year period.
Herbst RA; Uter W; Pirker C; Geier J; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 15291826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Periorbital dermatitis in 4779 patients - patch test results during a 10-year period.
Landeck L; John SM; Geier J
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Apr; 70(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 24325408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patterns of cosmetic contact allergy.
Castanedo-Tardan MP; Zug KA
Dermatol Clin; 2009 Jul; 27(3):265-80, vi. PubMed ID: 19580921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eyelid allergic contact dermatitis to black iron oxide.
Saxena M; Warshaw E; Ahmed DD
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 11244140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of patch testing patients with a scattered generalized distribution of dermatitis: retrospective cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001 to 2004.
Zug KA; Rietschel RL; Warshaw EM; Belsito DV; Taylor JS; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Fowler JF; Marks JG; DeLeo VA; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 59(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 18597890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Albert MR; González S; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: prevalence of sensitization to different allergens and associated factors].
Bordel-Gómez MT; Miranda-Romero A; Castrodeza-Sanz J
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2010; 101(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 20109394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital.
Disphanurat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S7-14. PubMed ID: 21294394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre.
Clayton TH; Wilkinson SM; Rawcliffe C; Pollock B; Clark SM
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 154(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 16403103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact dermatitis by dipivefrine.
Vilaplana J; Zaballos P; Romaguera C
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Mar; 52(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 15811042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contact dermatitis to ophthalmic solutions.
Mughal AA; Kalavala M
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2012 Aug; 37(6):593-7; quiz 597-8. PubMed ID: 22816984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anogenital dermatitis in patients referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2004.
Warshaw EM; Furda LM; Maibach HI; Rietschel RL; Fowler JF; Belsito DV; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jun; 144(6):749-55. PubMed ID: 18559763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Periocular dermatitis: a report of 401 patients.
Temesvári E; Pónyai G; Németh I; Hidvégi B; Sas A; Kárpáti S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 18761544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Contact sensitization to allergens in the Spanish standard series at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain: a retrospective study (2005-2010)].
Aguilar-Bernier M; Bernal-Ruiz AI; Rivas-Ruiz F; Fernández-Morano MT; de Troya-Martín M
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2012 Apr; 103(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 21963222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency of contact allergy in German children and adolescents patch tested between 1995 and 2002: results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Heine G; Schnuch A; Uter W; Worm M
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 15479199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Topical ophthalmic agents as allergens in periorbital dermatitis.
Landeck L; John SM; Geier J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 98(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 24276696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
