These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20541835)

  • 1. On the link between contaminant source release conditions and plume prediction uncertainty.
    de Barros FP; Nowak W
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jul; 116(1-4):24-34. PubMed ID: 20541835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stochastic evaluation of mixing-controlled steady-state plume lengths in two-dimensional heterogeneous domains.
    Cirpka OA; Rolle M; Chiogna G; de Barros FP; Nowak W
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Sep; 138-139():22-39. PubMed ID: 22796625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty assessment of contaminant plume length estimates in heterogeneous aquifers.
    Beyer C; Bauer S; Kolditz O
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):73-95. PubMed ID: 16781794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: II. Coupling source strength functions to plume evolution.
    Falta RW; Basu N; Rao PS
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Sep; 79(1-2):45-66. PubMed ID: 16061307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A PCE groundwater plume discharging to a river: influence of the streambed and near-river zone on contaminant distributions.
    Conant B; Cherry JA; Gillham RW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):249-79. PubMed ID: 15336797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of temporally variable groundwater flow conditions on point measurements and contaminant mass flux estimations.
    Rein A; Bauer S; Dietrich P; Beyer C
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Sep; 108(3-4):118-33. PubMed ID: 19682766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal design of pump-and-treat systems under uncertain hydraulic conductivity and plume distribution.
    Baú DA; Mayer AS
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Aug; 100(1-2):30-46. PubMed ID: 18635286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A stochastic-advective transport model for NAPL dissolution and degradation in non-uniform flows in porous media.
    Chan TP; Govindaraju RS
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Oct; 87(3-4):253-76. PubMed ID: 16857294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost optimization of DNAPL source and plume remediation under uncertainty using a semi-analytic model.
    Cardiff M; Liu X; Kitanidis PK; Parker J; Kim U
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Apr; 113(1-4):25-43. PubMed ID: 20185203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effective sampling network design for contaminant plume monitoring under general hydrogeological conditions.
    Wu J; Zheng C; Chien CC
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Mar; 77(1-2):41-65. PubMed ID: 15722172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodology for comparing source and plume remediation alternatives.
    Falta RW
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(2):272-85. PubMed ID: 18266737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Travel time and trajectory moments of conservative solutes in two-dimensional convergent flows.
    Riva M; Sánchez-Vila X; Guadagnini A; De Simoni M; Willmann M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):23-43. PubMed ID: 16216383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of groundwater contamination using concentration-time series recorded during an integral pumping test: bias introduced by strong concentration gradients within the plume.
    Zeru A; Schäfer G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Dec; 81(1-4):106-24. PubMed ID: 16216382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the natural attenuation of organic contaminants in aquifers using plume-scale electron and carbon balances: model development with analysis of uncertainty and parameter sensitivity.
    Thornton SF; Lerner DN; Banwart SA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2001 Dec; 53(3-4):199-232. PubMed ID: 11820471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rebound of a coal tar creosote plume following partial source zone treatment with permanganate.
    Thomson NR; Fraser MJ; Lamarche C; Barker JF; Forsey SP
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov; 102(1-2):154-71. PubMed ID: 18757111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plume persistence caused by back diffusion from thin clay layers in a sand aquifer following TCE source-zone hydraulic isolation.
    Parker BL; Chapman SW; Guilbeault MA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov; 102(1-2):86-104. PubMed ID: 18775583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterisation of a DNAPL source zone in a porous aquifer using the Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test and an inverse modelling approach.
    Dridi L; Pollet I; Razakarisoa O; Schäfer G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Jun; 107(1-2):22-44. PubMed ID: 19395120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stochastic study of solute transport in a nonstationary medium.
    Hu BX
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 16556204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plume detachment and recession times in fractured rock.
    West MR; Kueper BH
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(3):416-26. PubMed ID: 20070379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a fuzzy-stochastic nonlinear model to incorporate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
    Li H; Zhang K
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jan; 111(1-4):1-12. PubMed ID: 19945767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.