293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20541889)
1. Mini-midvastus vs standard medial parapatellar approach: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
Nestor BJ; Toulson CE; Backus SI; Lyman SL; Foote KL; Windsor RE
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):5-11, 11.e1. PubMed ID: 20541889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the mini-midvastus with the mini-medial parapatellar approach in primary TKA.
Li XG; Tang TS; Qian ZL; Huang LX; Pan WM; Zhu RF
Orthopedics; 2010 Oct; 33(10):723. PubMed ID: 20954671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study.
Zhang Z; Zhu W; Gu B; Zhu L; Chen C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Mar; 133(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 23229457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial.
Feczko P; Engelmann L; Arts JJ; Campbell D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():19. PubMed ID: 26762175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: outcomes pendulum is at equilibrium.
Heekin RD; Fokin AA
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 23790343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Bonutti PM; Zywiel MG; Ulrich SD; Stroh DA; Seyler TM; Mont MA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):575-82. PubMed ID: 20194315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early recovery after total knee arthroplasty performed with and without patellar eversion and tibial translation. A prospective randomized study.
Dalury DF; Mulliken BD; Adams MJ; Lewis C; Sauder RR; Bushey JA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1339-43. PubMed ID: 19487510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does mini-midvastus approach have an advantageous effect on rapid recovery protocols over medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty?
Zora H; Güngör HR; Bayrak G; Şavkın R; Büker N
Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2020; 31(3):571-581. PubMed ID: 32962591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quadriceps-sparing, minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study.
Lin WP; Lin J; Horng LC; Chang SM; Jiang CC
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1024-32. PubMed ID: 18757172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded study on early rehabilitation.
Bäthis H; Perlick L; Blum C; Lüring C; Perlick C; Grifka J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2005 Oct; 13(7):545-50. PubMed ID: 15650890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing the midvastus and subvastus to the medial peripatellar approach.
Liu HW; Gu WD; Xu NW; Sun JY
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2298-304. PubMed ID: 24295800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release of stiff knees in total knee arthroplasty.
Zhang Y; Ye LY; Liu HX; Wen H
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jul; 20(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 25963610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of quadriceps-sparing minimally invasive and medial parapatellar total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up study.
Chiang H; Lee CC; Lin WP; Jiang CC
J Formos Med Assoc; 2012 Dec; 111(12):698-704. PubMed ID: 23265749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strength and voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris muscle in total knee arthroplasty with midvastus and subvastus approaches.
Berth A; Urbach D; Neumann W; Awiszus F
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 17197313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Li Z; Cheng W; Sun L; Yao Y; Cao Q; Ye S; Qi L; Xu S; Wu X; Jing J
Int Orthop; 2018 Mar; 42(3):543-549. PubMed ID: 29199379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The John Insall award: no benefit of minimally invasive TKA on gait and strength outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.
Wegrzyn J; Parratte S; Coleman-Wood K; Kaufman KR; Pagnano MW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jan; 471(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 22806264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional and radiological outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial.
Juosponis R; Tarasevicius S; Smailys A; Kalesinskas RJ
Int Orthop; 2009 Oct; 33(5):1233-7. PubMed ID: 18654774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between minimally invasive lateral approach and mini-midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty.
Siramanakul C; Sriphirom P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Oct; 95 Suppl 10():S53-7. PubMed ID: 23451439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Progressive quadriceps incision during minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty: the effect on early postoperative ambulation.
Tanavalee A; Thiengwittayaporn S; Itiravivong P
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):1013-8. PubMed ID: 17920474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Mini-Midvastus and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty with Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 5-Year Follow-up.
Verburg H; Mathijssen NM; Niesten DD; Verhaar JA; Pilot P
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jun; 98(12):1014-22. PubMed ID: 27307362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
