These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20542056)

  • 21. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The trial context determines adjusted localization of stimuli: reconciling the Fröhlich and onset repulsion effects.
    Müsseler J; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(19):2201-6. PubMed ID: 15208006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stimulus competition by inhibitory interference.
    Tiesinga PH
    Neural Comput; 2005 Nov; 17(11):2421-53. PubMed ID: 16156934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modulation of visual stimulus discrimination by sustained focal attention: an MEG study.
    Pilz KS; Braun C; Altpeter E; Mackeben M; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1225-9. PubMed ID: 16505062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases.
    McMains SA; Fehd HM; Emmanouil TA; Kastner S
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2110-21. PubMed ID: 17671104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perisaccadic mislocalization in dyslexia.
    Liddle E; Chou YJ; Jackson S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18789347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving residual vision by attentional cueing in patients with brain lesions.
    Poggel DA; Kasten E; Müller-Oehring EM; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 16777076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual-field asymmetry in dual-stream RSVP.
    Holländer A; Corballis MC; Hamm JP
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15488903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Eccentricity effects on lateral interactions.
    Shani R; Sagi D
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):2009-24. PubMed ID: 15820518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emotionally arousing stimuli compete for attention with left hemispace.
    Hartikainen KM; Ogawa KH; Soltani M; Knight RT
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1929-33. PubMed ID: 18007189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relationship between the amplitude of alpha waves and reaction time.
    Kirschfeld K
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jun; 19(9):907-10. PubMed ID: 18520991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.
    Grosbras MH; Paus T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1109-20. PubMed ID: 12419133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural basis of visual distraction.
    Kim SY; Hopfinger JB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1794-807. PubMed ID: 19702467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Time course of visual attention across perceptual levels and objects.
    Srivastava P; Kumar D; Srinivasan N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 20937502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.