These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20542451)

  • 1. Post-CABG coronary CT angiography: radiation dose and graft image quality in retrospective versus prospective ECG gating.
    Chazen JL; Prince MR; Yip R; Min JK; Weinsaft JW; Henschke CI; Cham MD
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1122-7. PubMed ID: 20542451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Qin J; Liu LY; Meng XC; Zhang JS; Dong YX; Fang Y; Shan H
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 21513855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for dual source CT of the coronary stent: comparison of image quality, accuracy, and radiation dose.
    Zhao L; Zhang Z; Fan Z; Yang L; Du J
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 19783395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low dose high-pitch spiral acquisition 128-slice dual-source computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency.
    Goetti R; Leschka S; Baumüller S; Plass A; Wieser M; Desbiolles L; Stolzmann P; Falk V; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Feuchtner G
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):324-30. PubMed ID: 20404735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective electrocardiogram-gated axial 64-detector computed tomographic angiography vs retrospective gated helical technique to assess coronary artery bypass graft anastomosis: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Machida H; Masukawa A; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Suzuki K; Ueno E; Kodera K; Nakano K; Shen Y
    Circ J; 2010 Apr; 74(4):735-40. PubMed ID: 20154407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row multidetector CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-gating combined with fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in the assessment of coronary artery bypass: evaluation of dose reduction and image quality.
    Ippolito D; Fior D; Franzesi CT; Riva L; Casiraghi A; Sironi S
    Radiol Med; 2017 Dec; 122(12):893-901. PubMed ID: 28849537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: Radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating.
    Shuman WP; Branch KR; May JM; Mitsumori LM; Strote JN; Warren BH; Dubinsky TJ; Lockhart DW; Caldwell JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1662-7. PubMed ID: 19457832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-dose adaptive sequential scan for dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rate: comparison with retrospective ECG gating.
    Xu L; Yang L; Zhang Z; Li Y; Fan Z; Ma X; Lv B; Yu W
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 19595528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective ECG triggering versus low-dose retrospective ECG-gated 128-channel CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Feng Q; Yin Y; Hua X; Zhu R; Hua J; Xu J
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Oct; 65(10):809-14. PubMed ID: 20797467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-dose, prospective triggered high-pitch spiral coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with retrospective spiral technique.
    Srichai MB; Lim RP; Donnino R; Mannelli L; Hiralal R; Avery R; Ho C; Babb JS; Jacobs JE
    Acad Radiol; 2012 May; 19(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 22366557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronary CT angiography with single-source and dual-source CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose between prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated protocols.
    Sabarudin A; Sun Z; Yusof AK
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):746-53. PubMed ID: 23098849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT coronary angiography: a systematic review of radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.
    Sun Z; Ng KH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):e94-100. PubMed ID: 21316887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. First experience with 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scanning with prospective electrocardiogram gating to reduce radiation dose.
    Hoe J; Toh KH
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 19577215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using the 128-slice MDCT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Jeong DW; Choo KS; Baik SK; Kim YW; Jeon UB; Kim JS; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 21498343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 320-detector CT coronary angiography with prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram gating in a single heartbeat: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Qin J; Liu LY; Fang Y; Zhu JM; Wu Z; Zhu KS; Zhang JS; Shan H
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):945-51. PubMed ID: 22745204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of additional coronary calcium scoring in low-dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering impact on total effective radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.
    Husmann L; Herzog BA; Burger IA; Buechel RR; Pazhenkottil AP; von Schulthess P; Wyss CA; Gaemperli O; Landmesser U; Kaufmann PA
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 19944630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Shuman WP; Branch KR; May JM; Mitsumori LM; Lockhart DW; Dubinsky TJ; Warren BH; Caldwell JH
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 18552312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of attenuation-based tube current control in coronary artery calcium scoring on prospective ECG-triggered 64-detector CT.
    Horiguchi J; Matsuura N; Yamamoto H; Kitagawa T; Sato K; Kihara Y; Ito K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1231-40. PubMed ID: 19515586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining Coronary with Carotid and Cerebrovascular Angiography Using Prospective ECG Gating and Iterative Reconstruction with 256-slice CT.
    Zhang JL; Liu BL; Zhao YM; Liang HW; Wang GK; Wan Y; Huang YH; Shen BZ
    Echocardiography; 2015 Aug; 32(8):1291-8. PubMed ID: 25371093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose.
    Menke J; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Staab W; Sohns JM; Seif Amir Hosseini A; Schwarz A
    Am Heart J; 2013 Feb; 165(2):154-63.e3. PubMed ID: 23351817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.