133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20543311)
1. Electronic interchange of lab test orders and results between laboratories reduces errors and gives full traceability.
Johansen I; Rasmussen M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 155():65-8. PubMed ID: 20543311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The significance of a usability evaluation of an emerging laboratory order entry system.
Peute LW; Jaspers MW
Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(2-3):157-68. PubMed ID: 16854617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MedCom: laboratory test ordering--fully implemented nationwide in less than 3 years.
Johansen I; Rasmussen M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 174():29-33. PubMed ID: 22491105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomy of a failure: a sociotechnical evaluation of a laboratory physician order entry system implementation.
Peute LW; Aarts J; Bakker PJ; Jaspers MW
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Apr; 79(4):e58-70. PubMed ID: 19640778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What do physicians tell laboratories when requesting tests? A multi-method examination of information supplied to the microbiology laboratory before and after the introduction of electronic ordering.
Georgiou A; Prgomet M; Toouli G; Callen J; Westbrook J
Int J Med Inform; 2011 Sep; 80(9):646-54. PubMed ID: 21757400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory results. Timeliness as a quality attribute and strategy.
Howanitz JH; Howanitz PJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Sep; 116(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 11554156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of 2D bar code and electronic cross-matching in the reduction of misidentification errors in a pathology laboratory. A safety system assisted by the use of information technology.
Fabbretti G
Pathologica; 2011 Dec; 103(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 22558887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Six Sigma approach to the rate and clinical effect of registration errors in a laboratory.
Vanker N; van Wyk J; Zemlin AE; Erasmus RT
J Clin Pathol; 2010 May; 63(5):434-7. PubMed ID: 20299386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lab connections. Allina Laboratories, Minneapolis.
Villella R
Healthc Inform; 2000 Oct; 17(10):119-20. PubMed ID: 11141744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When requests become orders--a formative investigation into the impact of a computerized physician order entry system on a pathology laboratory service.
Georgiou A; Westbrook J; Braithwaite J; Iedema R; Ray S; Forsyth R; Dimos A; Germanos T
Int J Med Inform; 2007 Aug; 76(8):583-91. PubMed ID: 16702022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The California Clinical Data Project: a case study in the adoption of clinical data standards for quality improvement.
Sujansky W; Chang S
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(3):71-8. PubMed ID: 16903664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Management of pre-analytical nonconformities].
Berkane Z; Dhondt JL; Drouillard I; Flourié F; Giannoli JM; Houlbert C; Surgat P; Szymanowicz A;
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():131-45. PubMed ID: 21613011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electronic laboratory reporting for the infectious diseases physician and clinical microbiologist.
Wurtz R; Cameron BJ
Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Jun; 40(11):1638-43. PubMed ID: 15889362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LABKA. A real-time computer system for the clinical laboratory.
Christiansen JU; Maruard CD; Nielsen HC
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1989; 194():57-61. PubMed ID: 2772556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significant reduction of laboratory specimen labeling errors by implementation of an electronic ordering system paired with a bar-code specimen labeling process.
Hill PM; Mareiniss D; Murphy P; Gardner H; Hsieh YH; Levy F; Kelen GD
Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):630-6. PubMed ID: 20822830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of laboratory monitoring alerts within a computerized physician order entry system for medication orders.
Palen TE; Raebel M; Lyons E; Magid DM
Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jul; 12(7):389-95. PubMed ID: 16834525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Can we rely on electronic reporting of laboratory results?].
Stensland E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Aug; 120(19):2300-2. PubMed ID: 10997092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of workflow-integrated corollary orders on aminoglycoside monitoring in children.
Abboud PA; Ancheta R; McKibben M; Jacobs BR;
Health Informatics J; 2006 Sep; 12(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 17023407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A QA plan to monitor charted lab results.
Comer K; Shaw L; Perrotta G
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Mar; 24(3):31-3. PubMed ID: 10170953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathology's front line - a comparison of the experiences of electronic ordering in the clinical chemistry and haematology departments.
Georgiou A; Lang S; Alvaro F; Whittaker G; Westbrook JI; Callen J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 130():121-32. PubMed ID: 17917187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
