These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20543311)

  • 1. Electronic interchange of lab test orders and results between laboratories reduces errors and gives full traceability.
    Johansen I; Rasmussen M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 155():65-8. PubMed ID: 20543311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The significance of a usability evaluation of an emerging laboratory order entry system.
    Peute LW; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(2-3):157-68. PubMed ID: 16854617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MedCom: laboratory test ordering--fully implemented nationwide in less than 3 years.
    Johansen I; Rasmussen M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 174():29-33. PubMed ID: 22491105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomy of a failure: a sociotechnical evaluation of a laboratory physician order entry system implementation.
    Peute LW; Aarts J; Bakker PJ; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Apr; 79(4):e58-70. PubMed ID: 19640778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What do physicians tell laboratories when requesting tests? A multi-method examination of information supplied to the microbiology laboratory before and after the introduction of electronic ordering.
    Georgiou A; Prgomet M; Toouli G; Callen J; Westbrook J
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 Sep; 80(9):646-54. PubMed ID: 21757400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory results. Timeliness as a quality attribute and strategy.
    Howanitz JH; Howanitz PJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Sep; 116(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 11554156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of 2D bar code and electronic cross-matching in the reduction of misidentification errors in a pathology laboratory. A safety system assisted by the use of information technology.
    Fabbretti G
    Pathologica; 2011 Dec; 103(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 22558887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Six Sigma approach to the rate and clinical effect of registration errors in a laboratory.
    Vanker N; van Wyk J; Zemlin AE; Erasmus RT
    J Clin Pathol; 2010 May; 63(5):434-7. PubMed ID: 20299386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lab connections. Allina Laboratories, Minneapolis.
    Villella R
    Healthc Inform; 2000 Oct; 17(10):119-20. PubMed ID: 11141744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When requests become orders--a formative investigation into the impact of a computerized physician order entry system on a pathology laboratory service.
    Georgiou A; Westbrook J; Braithwaite J; Iedema R; Ray S; Forsyth R; Dimos A; Germanos T
    Int J Med Inform; 2007 Aug; 76(8):583-91. PubMed ID: 16702022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The California Clinical Data Project: a case study in the adoption of clinical data standards for quality improvement.
    Sujansky W; Chang S
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(3):71-8. PubMed ID: 16903664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Management of pre-analytical nonconformities].
    Berkane Z; Dhondt JL; Drouillard I; Flourié F; Giannoli JM; Houlbert C; Surgat P; Szymanowicz A;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():131-45. PubMed ID: 21613011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic laboratory reporting for the infectious diseases physician and clinical microbiologist.
    Wurtz R; Cameron BJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Jun; 40(11):1638-43. PubMed ID: 15889362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LABKA. A real-time computer system for the clinical laboratory.
    Christiansen JU; Maruard CD; Nielsen HC
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1989; 194():57-61. PubMed ID: 2772556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significant reduction of laboratory specimen labeling errors by implementation of an electronic ordering system paired with a bar-code specimen labeling process.
    Hill PM; Mareiniss D; Murphy P; Gardner H; Hsieh YH; Levy F; Kelen GD
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):630-6. PubMed ID: 20822830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of laboratory monitoring alerts within a computerized physician order entry system for medication orders.
    Palen TE; Raebel M; Lyons E; Magid DM
    Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jul; 12(7):389-95. PubMed ID: 16834525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Can we rely on electronic reporting of laboratory results?].
    Stensland E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Aug; 120(19):2300-2. PubMed ID: 10997092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of workflow-integrated corollary orders on aminoglycoside monitoring in children.
    Abboud PA; Ancheta R; McKibben M; Jacobs BR;
    Health Informatics J; 2006 Sep; 12(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 17023407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A QA plan to monitor charted lab results.
    Comer K; Shaw L; Perrotta G
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Mar; 24(3):31-3. PubMed ID: 10170953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pathology's front line - a comparison of the experiences of electronic ordering in the clinical chemistry and haematology departments.
    Georgiou A; Lang S; Alvaro F; Whittaker G; Westbrook JI; Callen J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 130():121-32. PubMed ID: 17917187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.