These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20543418)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw placement: a feasibility study.
    Wagnac E; Michardière D; Garo A; Arnoux PJ; Mac-Thiong JM; Aubin CE
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 158():167-71. PubMed ID: 20543418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of bone materials on the screw pull-out strength in human spine.
    Zhang QH; Tan SH; Chou SM
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Oct; 28(8):795-801. PubMed ID: 16414303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of fixation screw pull-out strength on human spine.
    Zhang QH; Tan SH; Chou SM
    J Biomech; 2004 Apr; 37(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 14996559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine.
    Little AS; Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. PubMed ID: 20173568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation.
    van Laar W; Meester RJ; Smit TH; van Royen BJ
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1209-14. PubMed ID: 17203270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical characteristics of cancellous screw in different bone densities].
    Tian C; Zhang MC; Ouyang J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2466-8. PubMed ID: 21097407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
    Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study.
    Hasegawa T; Inufusa A; Imai Y; Mikawa Y; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine J; 2005; 5(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 15863077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Finite element analysis of stress changes of posterior spinal pedicle screw infixation].
    Yan JZ; Wu ZH; Xu RX; Wang XS; Xing ZJ; Zhao Y; Zhang JG; Shen JX; Wang YP; Qiu GX
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 19489235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical tests and finite element models for bone holding power of tibial locking screws.
    Hou SM; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Chao CK; Lin J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Aug; 19(7):738-45. PubMed ID: 15288461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery.
    Papadopoulos EC; Girardi FP; Sama A; Sandhu HS; Cammisa FP
    Spine J; 2005; 5(3):263-7; discussion 268. PubMed ID: 15863081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of dilation of immature pedicles on pullout strength of the screws: Part 2: In vivo study.
    Yilmaz G; Demirkiran G; Ozkan C; Daglioglu K; Pekmezci M; Alanay A; Yazici M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2378-83. PubMed ID: 19829250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Biomechanical modeling of instrumentation for the scoliotic spine using flexible elements: a feasibility study].
    Poulin F; Aubin CE; Stokes IA; Gardner-Morse M; Labelle H
    Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):761-7. PubMed ID: 9846426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the anatomic trajectory for thoracic pedicle screw salvage after failure/violation using the straight-forward technique: a biomechanical analysis.
    Lehman RA; Kuklo TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2072-7. PubMed ID: 14501916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
    Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.
    Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.
    Derincek A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 16778665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.