These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20543937)

  • 21. Microkeratome complications.
    Lee JK; Nkyekyer EW; Chuck RS
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 20(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 19398909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study.
    Durrie DS; Kezirian GM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 15721704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incidence of diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with the IntraLase 15 kHz femtosecond laser and Moria M2 microkeratome.
    Gil-Cazorla R; Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; Fuentes I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18165077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Very high-frequency digital ultrasound measurement of the LASIK flap thickness profile using the IntraLase femtosecond laser and M2 and Carriazo-Pendular microkeratomes.
    Alió JL; Piñero DP
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 24(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 18269144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome flap creation.
    Antonios R; Arba Mosquera S; Awwad ST
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1602-9. PubMed ID: 26432116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for flap cutting in LASIK.
    Xia LK; Yu J; Chai GR; Wang D; Li Y
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 26309880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.
    Kahuam-López N; Navas A; Castillo-Salgado C; Graue-Hernandez EO; Jimenez-Corona A; Ibarra A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012946. PubMed ID: 32255519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
    Buzzonetti L; Petrocelli G; Valente P; Tamburrelli C; Mosca L; Laborante A; Balestrazzi E
    Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanical penetration of a femtosecond laser-created laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flap.
    Shah SA; Stark WJ
    Cornea; 2010 Mar; 29(3):336-8. PubMed ID: 20098318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of flap adhesion strength using the Amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase iFS femtosecond laser in rabbits.
    Knorz MC; Vossmerbaeumer U
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 24(9):875-8. PubMed ID: 19044226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Cerviño-Expósito A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1934-44. PubMed ID: 21029903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Huhtala A; Pietilä J; Mäkinen P; Uusitalo H
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():393-404. PubMed ID: 27022236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser.
    Hamilton DR; Johnson RD; Lee N; Bourla N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2049-56. PubMed ID: 19027558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Macular hemorrhage after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Principe AH; Lin DY; Small KW; Aldave AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Oct; 138(4):657-9. PubMed ID: 15488801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early flap displacement after LASIK.
    Clare G; Moore TC; Grills C; Leccisotti A; Moore JE; Schallhorn S
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Sep; 118(9):1760-5. PubMed ID: 21550119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictors of Myopic Regression for Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis Flap Creation with Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser in Low and Moderate Myopia.
    Zhou J; Gao Y; Li S; Gu W; Wu L; Guo X
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 31878825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison of posterior vitreous detachment after femtosecond laser and microkeratome-assisted lase in situ keratomileusis].
    Wang TT; Wang Y; Zhao SZ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 49(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 23900089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Salomão MQ; Wilson SE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1024-32. PubMed ID: 20494777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sub-epithelial gas breakthrough during femtosecond laser flap creation for LASIK.
    Srinivasan S; Herzig S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1373. PubMed ID: 17895418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in the refractive index of the human corneal stroma during laser in situ keratomileusis. Effects of exposure time and method used to create the flap.
    Patel S; Alió JL; Artola A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18571072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.