170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20544579)
1. [Consensus Meeting of Course Directors in Breast Imaging, 9 May 2009, in Frankfurt am Main - Topic: Masses].
Müller-Schimpfle MP; Heindel W; Kettritz U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bick U
Rofo; 2010 Aug; 182(8):671-5. PubMed ID: 20544579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast MRI: opportunities and challenges.
Day D
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):45-8. PubMed ID: 20092173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging.
Hollingsworth AB; Stough RG; O'Dell CA; Brekke CE
Am J Surg; 2008 Sep; 196(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18436185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology.
Monti S; Galimberti V; Trifiro G; De Cicco C; Peradze N; Brenelli F; Fernandez-Rodriguez J; Rotmensz N; Latronico A; Berrettini A; Mauri M; Machado L; Luini A; Paganelli G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2928-31. PubMed ID: 17674108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer--a comparison with [corrected] staging methods according to the S 3 guidelines].
Hausmann D; Kern C; Schröder MT; Sütterlin M; Schönberg SO; Neff KW; Dinter DJ
Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22068844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications.
Adkisson CD; Vallow LA; Kowalchik K; McNeil R; Hines S; Deperi E; Moreno A; Roy V; Perez EA; McLaughlin SA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):1678-83. PubMed ID: 21207171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perspectives on preoperative staging with breast MRI.
Hollingsworth AB
J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Jul; 199(1):173-4. PubMed ID: 15217651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can magnetic resonance imaging be used to select patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy in prophylactic mastectomy?
McLaughlin SA; Stempel M; Morris EA; Liberman L; King TA
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1214-21. PubMed ID: 18257089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time from diagnosis to definitive operative treatment of operable breast cancer in the era of multimodal imaging.
Hulvat M; Sandalow N; Rademaker A; Helenowski I; Hansen NM
Surgery; 2010 Oct; 148(4):746-50; discussion 750-1. PubMed ID: 20708761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of preoperative breast MRIs on timing of surgery and type of intervention in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
Angarita FA; Acuna SA; Fonseca A; Crystal P; Escallon J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():273-9. PubMed ID: 20853046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR is/is not a useful diagnostic tool for breast cancer management.
Van Goethem M; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Parizel PM
Acta Chir Belg; 2007 Jun; 107(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 17685251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].
Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C
Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Magnetic resonance mammography--open questions].
Kessler M; Sittek H; Reiser M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Aug; 56(8):M107-15. PubMed ID: 8974887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Mariscotti G; Houssami N; Durando M; Bergamasco L; Campanino PP; Ruggieri C; Regini E; Luparia A; Bussone R; Sapino A; Fonio P; Gandini G
Anticancer Res; 2014 Mar; 34(3):1219-25. PubMed ID: 24596363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Consensus Meeting of Course Directors in Breast Imaging, 7 May 2011, in Frankfurt am Main--topic: MRI of the breast].
Müller-Schimpfle MP; Heindel W; Kettritz U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bick U
Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):919-24. PubMed ID: 22851300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Bedrosian I; Mick R; Orel SG; Schnall M; Reynolds C; Spitz FR; Callans LS; Buzby GP; Rosato EF; Fraker DL; Czerniecki BJ
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 98(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 12879462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic difficulties in infiltrating lobular breast cancer: value of ultrasonography. 33 cases].
Escolano E; Tournegros JM; Le Marc'Hadour F; Bernard P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(8):781-8. PubMed ID: 9509318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis.
Deurloo EE; Peterse JL; Rutgers EJ; Besnard AP; Muller SH; Gilhuijs KG
Eur J Cancer; 2005 Jul; 41(10):1393-401. PubMed ID: 15913987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
