113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20544668)
1. Long-term comparison of porous and hydroxyapatite sleeves in femoral revision using the S-ROM modular stem.
Park YS; Lim SJ
Hip Int; 2010; 20(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 20544668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-Term Comparison of Porous Versus Hydroxyapatite Coated Sleeve of a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem (SROM) in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Tudor FS; Donaldson JR; Rodriguez-Elizalde SR; Cameron HU
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1777-80. PubMed ID: 25971533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
Yee AJ; Kreder HK; Bookman I; Davey JR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Sep; (366):120-32. PubMed ID: 10627726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem.
Sanchez-Sotelo J; Lewallen DG; Harmsen WS; Harrington J; Cabanela ME
Int Orthop; 2004 Aug; 28(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 15118841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?
Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical results in early and mid term of using the S-ROM femoral stem in revision].
Piao S; Zhou YG; Du YQ; Ma HY; Sun JY; Gao ZS; Peng YW; Wu WM
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Apr; 30(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 29349981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary total hip arthroplasty with use of the modular S-ROM prosthesis. Four to seven-year clinical and radiographic results.
Christie MJ; DeBoer DK; Trick LW; Brothers JC; Jones RE; Vise GT; Gruen TA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1707-16. PubMed ID: 10608382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects.
Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL
Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Midterm results of the cylindrical fully porous-coated uncemented femoral stem in revision patients with Paprosky I-IIIA femoral defects.
Ahmet S; İsmet KÖ; Mehmet E; Eren Y; Remzi T; Önder Y
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018783906. PubMed ID: 29969950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless stem: mid-term follow up.
Jibodh SR; Schwarzkopf R; Anthony SG; Malchau H; Dempsey KE; Estok DM
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1167-72. PubMed ID: 23114191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High revision rate of hydroxyapatite-coated ABG-I prosthesis.
Chung YY; Ki SC; So KY; Kim DH; Park KH; Lee YS
J Orthop Sci; 2009 Sep; 14(5):543-7. PubMed ID: 19802665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.
Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a 13-year follow-up.
Camazzola D; Hammond T; Gandhi R; Davey JR
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 18534441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mid-term outcome of a modular, cementless, proximally hydroxyapatite-coated, anatomic femoral stem.
Cossetto DJ; Goudar A
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2012 Dec; 20(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 23255638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of hydroxyapatite- and porous-coated stems in total hip replacement.
Park YS; Lee JY; Yun SH; Jung MW; Oh I
Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Jun; 74(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 12899544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of the ABG-1 hydroxyapatite coated total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 111 cases with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
Bidar R; Kouyoumdjian P; Munini E; Asencio G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):579-87. PubMed ID: 19926546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]