These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20545088)

  • 1. Virtual study models: a comparison of modular application systems.
    Favero L; Terrazzani C; Favero V; Stellini E; Cocilovo F
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):16-25. PubMed ID: 20545088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D surface imaging in dentistry - what we are looking at.
    Ireland AJ; McNamara C; Clover MJ; House K; Wenger N; Barbour ME; Alemzadeh K; Zhang L; Sandy JR
    Br Dent J; 2008 Oct; 205(7):387-92. PubMed ID: 18849941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity.
    Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interview with a SureSmile doctor: Nicole M. Jane. Interview by Robert P. Scholz.
    Jane NM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S140-3. PubMed ID: 19362265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models.
    Whetten JL; Williamson PC; Heo G; Varnhagen C; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 17045148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A system for the simulation and planning of orthodontic treatment using a low cost 3D laser scanner for dental anatomy capturing.
    Alcañiz M; Grau V; Monserrat C; Juan C; Albalat S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():8-14. PubMed ID: 10538404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study.
    Asquith J; Gillgrass T; Mossey P
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17974542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital treatment objectives: procedure and clinical application.
    Garino F; Garino GB
    Prog Orthod; 2004; 5(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 15546015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning: 3D virtual articulator: technical note.
    Ghanai S; Marmulla R; Wiechnik J; Mühling J; Kotrikova B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 39(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 20005674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality.
    Birnbaum NS; Aaronson HB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):494, 496, 498-505. PubMed ID: 18935788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interview with an Insignia doctor: David M. Sarver.
    Scholz RP; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 19962609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models.
    Hayashi K; Chung O; Park S; Lee SP; Sachdeva RC; Mizoguchi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 25726405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital casts in orthodontics: a comparison of 4 software systems.
    Westerlund A; Tancredi W; Ransjö M; Bresin A; Psonis S; Torgersson O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25836011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of virtual reality and stereolithographic models in maxillo-facial surgical planning.
    Robiony M; Salvo I; Costa F; Zerman N; Bandera C; Filippi S; Felice M; Politi M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):482-9. PubMed ID: 18362729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sure-Smile: technology-driven solution for orthodontics.
    Sachdeva R
    Tex Dent J; 2002 Jul; 119(7):608-15. PubMed ID: 12138533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models].
    Jedlińska A
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setups.
    Fabels LN; Nijkamp PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 25432262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.