145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20545530)
1. Photoelastic analysis of the influence of platform switching on stress distribution in implants.
Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Santiago JF; de Moraes SL; de Carvalho BM
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 20545530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of implant angulation with different crowns on stress distribution.
Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Sánchez DM; Rinaldi GA; de Aguirre CC; Goiato MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):434-7. PubMed ID: 21403571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations.
Nissan J; Ghelfan O; Gross O; Priel I; Gross M; Chaushu G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1934-9. PubMed ID: 21530042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale?
Maeda Y; Miura J; Taki I; Sogo M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 17608737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of platform switching on strain developed around implants supporting mandibular overdenture.
Sabet ME; El-Korashy DI; El-Mahrouky NA
Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 19667825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
