These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20546967)

  • 1. Modelling of mandible bone properties in the numerical analysis of oral implant biomechanics.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Nov; 100(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 20546967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical study of mandible bone supporting a four-implant retained bridge: finite element analysis of the influence of bone anisotropy and foodstuff position.
    Bonnet AS; Postaire M; Lipinski P
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Sep; 31(7):806-15. PubMed ID: 19395303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cortical bone thickness and implant length on bone strain and interfacial micromotion in an immediately loaded implant.
    Tu MG; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Huang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 20657865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental implants press fit phenomena: biomechanical analysis considering bone inelastic response.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 19128827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Fallgatter AM; Ko CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 17929515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of stress induced in peri-implant bone tissue by misfit in multi-implant prosthesis.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 16198407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A numerical approach to resonance frequency analysis for the investigation of oral implant osseointegration.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Schileo E; Williams KR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):674-81. PubMed ID: 16922741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selections of the cylinder implant neck taper and implant end fillet for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Liu Y; Li D; Qiu Z; Liu B
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(5):1124-30. PubMed ID: 18258239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical simulation of the effect of time-to-loading on peri-implant bone.
    Akça K; Eser A; Canay S
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 19864171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Adelino Ricardo Barão V; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 20098182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.