510 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20547110)
1. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study.
Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disc mechanics with trans-endplate partial nucleotomy are not fully restored following cyclic compressive loading and unloaded recovery.
Vresilovic EJ; Johannessen W; Elliott DM
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Dec; 128(6):823-9. PubMed ID: 17154681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fill of the nucleus cavity affects mechanical stability in compression, bending, and torsion of a spine segment, which has undergone nucleus replacement.
Arthur A; Cannella M; Keane M; Singhatat W; Vresilovic E; Marcolongo M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1128-35. PubMed ID: 20473120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stiffness of prosthetic nucleus determines stiffness of reconstructed lumbar calf disc.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP
Spine J; 2004; 4(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 15125847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core.
Moumene M; Geisler FH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1840-51. PubMed ID: 17762291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.
Auerbach JD; Ballester CM; Hammond F; Carine ET; Balderston RA; Elliott DM
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 20362251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Spiral Nucleus Implant Parameters on the Compressive Biomechanics of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc.
Du CF; Liu CJ; Huang YP; Wang X
World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e878-e884. PubMed ID: 31733385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The restoration of lumbar intervertebral disc load distribution: a comparison of three nucleus replacement technologies.
Dahl MC; Ahrens M; Sherman JE; Martz EO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):1445-53. PubMed ID: 20216342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc system composed of a cubic three-dimensional fabric.
Shikinami Y; Kawabe Y; Yasukawa K; Tsuta K; Kotani Y; Abumi K
Spine J; 2010 Feb; 10(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 19944651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of nucleus replacement device properties on lumbar spine mechanics.
Rundell SA; Guerin HL; Auerbach JD; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2022-32. PubMed ID: 19730210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of tissue engineered intervertebral discs under complex loads.
Yao J; Turteltaub SR; Ducheyne P
Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(3):377-87. PubMed ID: 16168476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis.
Le Huec JC; Lafage V; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Josse L; Liu M; Skalli W
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 20068471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Buck's direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis restores disc stresses at the involved and adjacent levels.
Sairyo K; Goel VK; Faizan A; Vadapalli S; Biyani S; Ebraheim N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 16959387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
