BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20548136)

  • 1. Uncertainties in studies of low statistical power.
    Boice JD
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 20548136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incomplete data on the Canadian cohort may have affected the results of the study by the International Agency for Research on Cancer on the radiogenic cancer risk among nuclear industry workers in 15 countries.
    Ashmore JP; Gentner NE; Osborne RV
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 20530869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children are very sensitive to radiation.
    Eisenberg W
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2009 Jun; 106(23):393; author reply 294. PubMed ID: 19623323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Against all logic.
    Claussen A
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2009 Jun; 106(23):392-3; author reply 294. PubMed ID: 19623320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The environment is radioactively contaminated.
    Zeller I
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2009 Jun; 106(23):392; author reply 294. PubMed ID: 19623321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confusion about childhood cancer study.
    Körblein A
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2009 Jun; 106(23):393-4; author reply 294. PubMed ID: 19623324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ignorance is a curse.
    Splieth B
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2009 Jun; 106(23):392; author reply 294. PubMed ID: 19623322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Operational quantities adieu.
    Tada JI
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):243-5. PubMed ID: 23580971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reanalysis of Epidemiological Investigation of Cancer Risk among People Residing near Nuclear Power Plants in South Korea.
    Kim JM; Kim MH; Ju YS; Hwang SS; Ha M; Kim BK; Zoh KE; Paek D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 29522487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pooled Bayesian meta-analysis of two Polish studies on radiation-induced cancers.
    Fornalski KW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Nov; 167(1-3):306-10. PubMed ID: 25956788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.
    Tubiana M; Feinendegen LE; Yang C; Kaminski JM
    Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 19332842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.
    Little MP; Wakeford R; Tawn EJ; Bouffler SD; Berrington de Gonzalez A
    Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 19332841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The third analysis of cancer mortality among Japanese nuclear workers, 1991-2002: estimation of excess relative risk per radiation dose.
    Akiba S; Mizuno S
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 22392887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionising radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture--a preliminary review of current plans.
    Akiba S
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22327057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do radiation doses below 1 cGy increase cancer risks?
    Brenner DJ; Mossman KL
    Radiat Res; 2005 Jun; 163(6):692-3. PubMed ID: 16044492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer risk among nuclear workers.
    Skelcher B
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Jun; 26(2):237-8. PubMed ID: 16881155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ICRP's lung cancer risk from protracted exposure to radon and its progeny.
    Chen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Dec; 152(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 23160509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some statistical implications of dose uncertainty in radiation dose-response analyses.
    Schafer DW; Gilbert ES
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):303-12. PubMed ID: 16808615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on "Are the risks from tritium exposures being underestimated?".
    Little MP; Lambert BE
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):454-6. PubMed ID: 19810288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lessons from Chernobyl and prognosis for Fukushima: radiological consequences.
    Ivanov VK
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N55-8. PubMed ID: 22394610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.