151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20548136)
21. The CT dose and utilization controversy: the radiologist's response.
Boland GW
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jun; 5(6):696-8. PubMed ID: 18514947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Radiation epidemiology: a perspective on Fukushima.
Boice JD
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N33-40. PubMed ID: 22395193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Studies of nuclear workers: the pros and cons.
Howe GR
Lancet; 2004 Oct 2-8; 364(9441):1199-200. PubMed ID: 15464167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. US radiation study sparks debate.
Zakaib GD
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7341):15. PubMed ID: 21475166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Preparing a scientific report to the general assembly on 'exposures due to the nuclear accident following the Great East-Japan earthquake and tsunami'.
Weiss W
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N113-8. PubMed ID: 22395001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Health risks associated with environmental radiation exposures.
Davis S
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N21-5. PubMed ID: 22395134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Some lessons on radiological protection learnt from the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant.
Kai M
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N101-5. PubMed ID: 22394670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The chornobyl accident: estimation of radiation doses received by the Baltic and Ukrainian cleanup workers.
Bouville A; Chumak VV; Inskip PD; Kryuchkov V; Luckyanov N
Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):158-67. PubMed ID: 16808604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comments on Bithell, J. F., Keegan, T. J., Kroll, M. E., Murphy, M. F. G. and Vincent, T. J., Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations: methodological issues and recent results. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 132(2), 191-197 (2008).
Körblein A; Fairlie I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jan; 138(1):87-8; author reply 89-91. PubMed ID: 19841011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimates of relative risks for cancers in a population after prolonged low-dose-rate radiation exposure: a follow-up assessment from 1983 to 2005.
Hwang SL; Hwang JS; Yang YT; Hsieh WA; Chang TC; Guo HR; Tsai MH; Tang JL; Lin IF; Chang WP
Radiat Res; 2008 Aug; 170(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 18666807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Low-dose risk assessment.
Tubiana M; Arengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
Radiat Res; 2007 Jun; 167(6):742-4; author reply 744. PubMed ID: 17523853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Hanford Thyroid Disease Study: an alternative view of the findings.
Hoffman FO; Ruttenber AJ; Apostoaei AI; Carroll RJ; Greenland S
Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 17220711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Ionizing radiation at low doses and cancer: epidemiological controversy].
Borja-Aburto VH; Bustamante-Montes P; García-Sancho MC; Villa-Romero AR
Rev Invest Clin; 1990; 42(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 2091182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An analysis of the radiation field characteristics for extremity dose assessment during maintenance periods at nuclear power plants in Korea.
Kim HG; Kong TY
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Dec; 152(4):468-71. PubMed ID: 22628525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Cancer risks from CT radiation: is there a dose threshold?
Cohen M
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Nov; 10(11):817-9. PubMed ID: 24044952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Cancer risks in a population with prolonged low dose-rate gamma-radiation exposure in radiocontaminated buildings, 1983-2002.
Hwang SL; Guo HR; Hsieh WA; Hwang JS; Lee SD; Tang JL; Chen CC; Chang TC; Wang JD; Chang WP
Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Dec; 82(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 17178625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comments on "adjusting lung cancer risks for temporal and spatial variations in radon concentrations in dwellings in Gansu Province, China" by Lubin et al. (Radiat. Res. 163, 571-579, 2005).
Tschiersch J; Haninger T
Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 1):120; author reply 121. PubMed ID: 16808598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Exposure to residential radon causes lung cancer. For the proposition.
Field RW
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):485-6. PubMed ID: 12722798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Exposure to residential radon causes lung cancer. Against the proposition.
Duport PJ
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):486-8. PubMed ID: 12722799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
