366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20548238)
1. Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.
Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):702-13. PubMed ID: 20548238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.
Vincent C; Bébéar JP; Radafy E; Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Lautissier S; Bordure P
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 22436413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.
Mok M; Galvin KL; Dowell RC; McKay CM
Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 19468210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
Cameron S; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants.
Beijen JW; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 17473710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful outcomes of cochlear implantation in long-term unilateral deafness: brain plasticity?
Távora-Vieira D; Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Maric V; Rajan GP
Neuroreport; 2013 Sep; 24(13):724-9. PubMed ID: 23880870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.
Bonnard D; Lautissier S; Bosset-Audoit A; Coriat G; Beraha M; Maunoury A; Martel J; Darrouzet V; Bébéar JP; Dauman R
Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 23548561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children.
Litovsky RY; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J; Peters R; Lake J; Johnstone P; Yu G
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 15148192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unilateral deafness in children: audiologic and subjective assessment of hearing ability after cochlear implantation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T; Kröger S; Laszig R; Beck RL; Schild C; Arndt S
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 23202150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Earlier intervention leads to better sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants.
Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Scherf F; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Offeciers FE; Van de Heyning PH; Dhooge IJ; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 19451705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech detection in noise and spatial unmasking in children with simultaneous versus sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Chadha NK; Papsin BC; Jiwani S; Gordon KA
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1057-64. PubMed ID: 21725259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
