BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20548238)

  • 21. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Francart T; Scherf F; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Van de Heyning PH; Offeciers FE; De Raeve L; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 19141992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sound localization and binaural hearing in children with a hearing aid and a cochlear implant.
    Beijen J; Snik AF; Straatman LV; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 19451708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children.
    Steffens T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Strutz J; Aschendorff A; Klenzner T; Rühl S; Voss B; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Lenarz T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Feb; 128(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 17851947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: speech recognition, sound localization, and parental reports.
    Asp F; Mäki-Torkko E; Karltorp E; Harder H; Hergils L; Eskilsson G; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Nov; 51(11):817-32. PubMed ID: 22937981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of acoustic cues by children with cochlear implants.
    Giezen MR; Escudero P; Baker A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1440-57. PubMed ID: 20689031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bilateral or unilateral cochlear implantation for deaf children: an observational study.
    Lovett RE; Kitterick PT; Hewitt CE; Summerfield AQ
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 Feb; 95(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19948510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of binaural functions in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Chan JC; Freed DJ; Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):296-310. PubMed ID: 18569102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors.
    Senn P; Kompis M; Vischer M; Haeusler R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(6):342-52. PubMed ID: 16103645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech performance and sound localization abilities in Neurelec Digisonic® SP binaural cochlear implant users.
    Verhaert N; Lazard DS; Gnansia D; Bébéar JP; Romanet P; Meyer B; Péan V; Mollard D; Truy E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 22584289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study.
    Steel MM; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117611. PubMed ID: 25668423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Kishon-Rabin L; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children.
    Schramm B; Bohnert A; Keilmann A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1673-81. PubMed ID: 19775758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance in children with hearing aids or cochlear implants: bilateral stimulation and binaural hearing.
    Ching TY; van Wanrooy E; Hill M; Incerti P
    Int J Audiol; 2006; 45 Suppl 1():S108-12. PubMed ID: 16938782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception.
    Litovsky RY; Gordon K
    Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 338():76-87. PubMed ID: 26828740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.