These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20548806)
1. Early outcomes of radial artery use in all-arterial grafting of the coronary arteries in patients 65 years and older. Erdil N; Nisanoglu V; Eroglu T; Fansa I; Cihan HB; Battaloglu B Tex Heart Inst J; 2010; 37(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 20548806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical Myocardial Revascularization with a Composite T-graft from the Left Internal Mammary Artery-Comparison of the Great Saphenous Vein with the Radial Artery. Eide A; Jussli-Melchers J; Friedrich C; Haneya A; Lutter G; Cremer J; Schoettler J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Sep; 72(6):413-422. PubMed ID: 37506730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts. Royse A; Pamment W; Pawanis Z; Clarke-Errey S; Eccleston D; Ajani A; Wilson W; Canty D; Royse C BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Mar; 20(1):148. PubMed ID: 32204693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. Dreifaldt M; Mannion JD; Bodin L; Olsson H; Zagozdzon L; Souza D Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Jul; 96(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 23684156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The second best arterial graft: a propensity analysis of the radial artery versus the free right internal thoracic artery to bypass the circumflex coronary artery. Tranbaugh RF; Dimitrova KR; Lucido DJ; Hoffman DM; Dincheva GR; Geller CM; Balaram SK; Ko W; Swistel DG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 24100104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up. Petrovic I; Nezic D; Peric M; Milojevic P; Djokic O; Kosevic D; Tasic N; Djukanovic B; Otasevic P J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 10():127. PubMed ID: 26466996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. Goldman S; Sethi GK; Holman W; Thai H; McFalls E; Ward HB; Kelly RF; Rhenman B; Tobler GH; Bakaeen FG; Huh J; Soltero E; Moursi M; Haime M; Crittenden M; Kasirajan V; Ratliff M; Pett S; Irimpen A; Gunnar W; Thomas D; Fremes S; Moritz T; Reda D; Harrison L; Wagner TH; Wang Y; Planting L; Miller M; Rodriguez Y; Juneman E; Morrison D; Pierce MK; Kreamer S; Shih MC; Lee K JAMA; 2011 Jan; 305(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 21224458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term clinical outcome and graft patency of radial artery and saphenous vein grafts in multiple arterial revascularization. Ruttmann E; Dietl M; Feuchtner GM; Metzler B; Bonaros N; Taggart DP; Gaudino M; Ulmer H; J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Aug; 158(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 30551960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should right coronary bypass grafts be anastomosed proximal or distal to the crux? A comparison of graft patencies. Aksut M; Koksal C; Kocamaz O; Aksoy E; Kara I; Onk A; Ozkaynak B Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012; 18(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 22673608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial. Zenati MA; Shroyer AL; Collins JF; Hattler B; Ota T; Almassi GH; Amidi M; Novitzky D; Grover FL; Sonel AF J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 141(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 21130476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age cutoff for the loss of survival benefit from use of radial artery in coronary artery bypass grafting. Benedetto U; Codispoti M J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 146(5):1078-84; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 24035317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second Arterial Versus Venous Conduits for Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in California. Goldstone AB; Chiu P; Baiocchi M; Wang H; Lingala B; Boyd JH; Woo YJ Circulation; 2018 Apr; 137(16):1698-1707. PubMed ID: 29242351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angiographic outcomes of radial artery versus saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cao C; Manganas C; Horton M; Bannon P; Munkholm-Larsen S; Ang SC; Yan TD J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Aug; 146(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 22871565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Literature Review. Virk HUH; Lakhter V; Ahmed M; O' Murchu B; Chatterjee S Curr Cardiol Rep; 2019 Mar; 21(5):36. PubMed ID: 30903300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries. Hu X; Zhao Q J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2011 Apr; 12(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 21462382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using an Internal Thoracic Artery versus a Radial Artery as a Second Arterial Graft. Oda R; Kajimoto K; Yamamoto T; Endo D; Kinoshita T; Amano A; Tabata M Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 38684396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]