These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20549319)

  • 1. A geospatial analysis of the impact of sex offender residency restrictions in two New York counties.
    Berenson JA; Appelbaum PS
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Jun; 35(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 20549319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd?
    Levenson JS; Cotter LP
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2005 Apr; 49(2):168-78. PubMed ID: 15746268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preventing sexual violence: can examination of offense location inform sex crime policy?
    Colombino N; Mercado CC; Levenson J; Jeglic E
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 21531024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public perception of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders.
    Schiavone SK; Jeglic EL
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2009 Dec; 53(6):679-95. PubMed ID: 18728128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community reentry.
    Mercado CC; Alvarez S; Levenson J
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Jun; 20(2):188-205. PubMed ID: 18490481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of sexual offenders against children with sexual offenders against adolescents and adults: data from the New York State Sex Offender Registry.
    Cohen LJ; Frenda S; Mojtabai R; Katsavdakis K; Galynker I
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2007 Nov; 13(6):373-84. PubMed ID: 18032982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misperceptions of sex offender perpetration: considering the impact of sex offender registration.
    Craun SW; Theriot MT
    J Interpers Violence; 2009 Dec; 24(12):2057-72. PubMed ID: 19074256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Views of sexual abuse professionals about sex offender notification policies.
    Levenson JS; Fortney T; Baker JN
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):150-68. PubMed ID: 19131567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public attitudes toward sexual offenders and sex offender registration.
    Kernsmith PD; Craun SW; Foster J
    J Child Sex Abus; 2009; 18(3):290-301. PubMed ID: 19856734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex offender reentry courts: a cost effective proposal for managing sex offender risk in the community.
    La Fond JQ; Winick BJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():300-23; discussion 352-9. PubMed ID: 12839907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of community notification on sex offender reintegration: a quantitative review of the research literature.
    Lasher MP; McGrath RJ
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):6-28. PubMed ID: 21123209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Too close for comfort? Registered sex offender spatial clustering and recidivistic sex crime arrest rates.
    Socia KM
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Dec; 25(6):531-56. PubMed ID: 23296093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using tax parcels to select a location-based sample: an illustration that examines residents' awareness of sex offenders in neighborhoods.
    Craun SW; Freisthler B
    Eval Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(4):315-34. PubMed ID: 18347200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Brothers Under the Bridge": Factors Influencing the Transience of Registered Sex Offenders in Florida.
    Socia KM; Levenson JS; Ackerman AR; Harris AJ
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Dec; 27(6):559-86. PubMed ID: 24501210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State residence restrictions and forcible rape rates: a multistate quasi-experimental analysis of UCR data.
    Socia KM
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Apr; 27(2):205-27. PubMed ID: 24225579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Juvenile female and male sex offenders: a comparison of offender, victim, and judicial processing characteristics.
    Vandiver DM; Teske R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Apr; 50(2):148-65. PubMed ID: 16510886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invisibility, safety and psycho-social distress among same-sex attracted women in rural South Australia.
    Edwards J
    Rural Remote Health; 2005; 5(1):343. PubMed ID: 15865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Post-release controls for sex offenders in the U.S. and UK.
    Lieb R; Kemshall H; Thomas T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 21555154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female and male sex offenders: a comparison of recidivism patterns and risk factors.
    Freeman NJ; Sandler JC
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1394-413. PubMed ID: 18349348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors contributing to perceptions about policies regarding the electronic monitoring of sex offenders: the role of demographic characteristics, victimization experiences, and social disorganization.
    Button DM; Tewksbury R; Mustaine EE; Payne BK
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Jan; 57(1):25-54. PubMed ID: 22158910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.