359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20549597)
1. [Record linkage of a large clinical practice patient cohort with the Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein].
Obi N; Waldmann A; Babaev V; Katalinic A
Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Jul; 73(7):452-8. PubMed ID: 20549597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The importance of the common cancer registry for the identification of cancer cases in the EPIC Potsdam-study -- results of the first record linkage].
Bergmann MM; Noethlings U; Eisinger B; Streller B; Quehl A; Walter D; Lahmann PH; Boeing H
Gesundheitswesen; 2004; 66(8-9):475-81. PubMed ID: 15372347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Relation of breast cancer tumour stage and the degree of registration in a population-based cancer registry].
Katalinic A; Holzmann M; Kunze U
Gesundheitswesen; 2003; 65(8-9):509-15. PubMed ID: 14505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The use of the Epidemiology Cancer registry Baden-Württemberg in the follow-up of the EPIC cohort].
Nagel G; Zoller D; Wiedmann T; Bussas U; El Idrissi-Lamghari C; Kneisel J; Batzler WU; Becker N
Gesundheitswesen; 2004; 66(8-9):469-74. PubMed ID: 15372346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the Quality assured Mamma Diagnostic (QuaMaDi) programme on survival of breast cancer patients.
Obi N; Waldmann A; Schäfer F; Schreer I; Katalinic A
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 35(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 20920901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Completeness of American Cancer Registry Treatment Data: implications for quality of care research.
Mallin K; Palis BE; Watroba N; Stewart AK; Walczak D; Singer J; Barron J; Blumenthal W; Haydu G; Edge SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Mar; 216(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 23357724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Linkage of secondary data with cancer registry data on the basis of encrypted personal identifiers - results from a pilot study in North Rhine-Westphalia].
Kajüter H; Batzler WU; Krieg V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e84-9. PubMed ID: 22836935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The age-specific differences in histopathological tumor characteristics and TNM classification of breast carcinomas in Quality assured mamma diagnostic (QuaMaDi) program in the state of Schleswig-Holstein in Germany.
Kramp LJ; Mathiak M; Behrens HM; Schäfer FW; van Mackelenbergh M; Röcken C
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2022 Feb; 148(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 34705105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New opportunities for drug outcomes research in cancer patients: the linkage of the Eindhoven Cancer Registry and the PHARMO Record Linkage System.
van Herk-Sukel MP; van de Poll-Franse LV; Lemmens VE; Vreugdenhil G; Pruijt JF; Coebergh JW; Herings RM
Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 46(2):395-404. PubMed ID: 19811904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer.
Meguerditchian AN; Stewart A; Roistacher J; Watroba N; Cropp M; Edge SB
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 101(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 20461766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The population-based oncological health care study OVIS - recruitment of the patients and analysis of the non-participants.
Pritzkuleit R; Waldmann A; Raspe H; Katalinic A
BMC Cancer; 2008 Oct; 8():311. PubMed ID: 18954435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining the quality of name code record linkage: what is the impact on death and cancer risk estimates? A validation study.
Swart A; Meagher NS; van Leeuwen MT; Zhao K; Grulich A; Mao L; Randall DA; Degenhardt L; Burns L; O'Connell D; Amin J; Vajdic CM
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Apr; 39(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 25377243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond mammography screening: quality assurance in breast cancer diagnosis (The QuaMaDi Project).
Katalinic A; Bartel C; Raspe H; Schreer I
Br J Cancer; 2007 Jan; 96(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 17179994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Determination of vital status by linkage of anonymised hospital and national mortality data].
Fournel I; Schwarzinger M; Benzenine E; Binquet C; Hill C; Quantin C
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2007 Oct; 55(5):365-73. PubMed ID: 17851008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study.
Dregan A; Moller H; Murray-Thomas T; Gulliford MC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 22727737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linkage of a clinical surgical registry with Medicare inpatient claims data using indirect identifiers.
Lawson EH; Ko CY; Louie R; Han L; Rapp M; Zingmond DS
Surgery; 2013 Mar; 153(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 23122901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Occupation and cancer - follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries.
Pukkala E; Martinsen JI; Lynge E; Gunnarsdottir HK; Sparén P; Tryggvadottir L; Weiderpass E; Kjaerheim K
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(5):646-790. PubMed ID: 19925375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
