121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20549602)
1. Comparison of unilateral hemilaminotomy and bilateral hemilaminotomy according to dural sac area in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Dalgic A; Uckun O; Ergungor MF; Okay O; Daglioglu E; Hatipoglu G; Pasaoglu L; Caglar YS
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2010 Apr; 53(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 20549602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of lumbar radiculopathy using the Pain Drawing Score, McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire, and risk factors including psychosocial issues and axial joint pain.
Voorhies RM; Jiang X; Thomas N
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 17905313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis.
Iwatsuki K; Yoshimine T; Aoki M
Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Microendoscopic decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis].
Yang B; Chen R; Xie P; Liu B; Dong J; Rong L
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 25(10):1158-63. PubMed ID: 22069964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note.
Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Cavuşoğlu H; Türkmenoğlu O; Kaya RA; Tuncer C; Colak I; Sahin Y; Aydin Y
Turk Neurosurg; 2007 Apr; 17(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 17935024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical classification of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis based on their leg pain syndrome: its correlation with 2-year surgical outcome.
Yamashita K; Aono H; Yamasaki R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):980-5. PubMed ID: 17450073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dural sac cross-sectional area does not correlate with efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in single level lumbar spinal stenosis.
Park CH; Lee SH; Jung JY
Pain Physician; 2011; 14(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21785481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.
Oertel MF; Ryang YM; Korinth MC; Gilsbach JM; Rohde V
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1264-9; discussion 1269-70. PubMed ID: 17277689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Five-year outcomes of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study of symptom severity at standard intervals after surgery.
Yamashita K; Ohzono K; Hiroshima K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(13):1484-90. PubMed ID: 16741459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Fu YS; Zeng BF; Xu JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18317196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Bilateral "over the top" decompression through unilateral laminotomy for lumbar and thoracic spinal canal stenosis].
Banczerowski P; Lipóth L; Veres R
Ideggyogy Sz; 2007 Nov; 60(11-12):467-73. PubMed ID: 18198793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Micro-decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: the early outcome using a modified surgical technique.
Orpen NM; Corner JA; Shetty RR; Marshall R
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 20357333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery.
Usman M; Ali M; Khanzada K; Ishaq M; Naeem-ul-Haq ; Aman R; Ali M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Dec; 23(12):852-6. PubMed ID: 24304987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
