These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20550271)

  • 21. Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.
    Mc Laughlin M; Reilly RB; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1546-60. PubMed ID: 23464025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceived loudness of speech based on the characteristics of glottal excitation source.
    Seshadri G; Yegnanarayana B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):2061-71. PubMed ID: 19813815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Habitual use of vocal fry in young adult female speakers.
    Wolk L; Abdelli-Beruh NB; Slavin D
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e111-6. PubMed ID: 21917418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An acoustic-perceptual study of vocal tremor.
    Anand S; Shrivastav R; Wingate JM; Chheda NN
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):811.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22921293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech synthesis by glottal excited linear prediction.
    Childers DG; Hu HT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2026-36. PubMed ID: 7963019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring the anatomical encoding of voice with a mathematical model of the vocal system.
    Assaneo MF; Sitt J; Varoquaux G; Sigman M; Cohen L; Trevisan MA
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():31-39. PubMed ID: 27436593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vocalic correlates of pitch in whispered versus normal speech.
    Heeren WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3800-10. PubMed ID: 26723334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Concurrent-vowel and tone recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Fu QJ; Wu HP; Hsu CJ
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):75-84. PubMed ID: 19595753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition.
    Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 24134065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A modeling investigation of articulatory variability and acoustic stability during American English /r/ production.
    Nieto-Castanon A; Guenther FH; Perkell JS; Curtin HD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3196-212. PubMed ID: 15957787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vocal quality factors: analysis, synthesis, and perception.
    Childers DG; Lee CK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Nov; 90(5):2394-410. PubMed ID: 1837797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When speaker identity is unavoidable: Neural processing of speaker identity cues in natural speech.
    Tuninetti A; Chládková K; Peter V; Schiller NO; Escudero P
    Brain Lang; 2017 Nov; 174():42-49. PubMed ID: 28715718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning.
    Chandrasekaran B; Sampath PD; Wong PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):456-65. PubMed ID: 20649239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. N400 during recognition of voice identity and vocal affect.
    Toivonen M; Rämä P
    Neuroreport; 2009 Sep; 20(14):1245-9. PubMed ID: 19623091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Glottal characteristics of male speakers: acoustic correlates and comparison with female data.
    Hanson HM; Chuang ES
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):1064-77. PubMed ID: 10462811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms.
    Wilson RH; Sanchez VA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):412-441. PubMed ID: 31968207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual integration of acoustic cues to laryngeal contrasts in Korean fricatives.
    Lee S; Katz J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 26936544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' segmentation of speech sequences.
    Bion RA; Benavides-Varela S; Nespor M
    Lang Speech; 2011 Mar; 54(Pt 1):123-40. PubMed ID: 21524015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.