176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20550594)
1. Methodologic evaluation of adaptive conjoint analysis to assess patient preferences: an application in oncology.
Pieterse AH; Stiggelbout AM; Marijnen CA
Health Expect; 2010 Dec; 13(4):392-405. PubMed ID: 20550594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive Conjoint Analysis as individual preference assessment tool: feasibility through the internet and reliability of preferences.
Pieterse AH; Berkers F; Baas-Thijssen MC; Marijnen CA; Stiggelbout AM
Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Feb; 78(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19581069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences.
Pieterse AH; Stiggelbout AM; Baas-Thijssen MC; van de Velde CJ; Marijnen CA
Br J Cancer; 2007 Sep; 97(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 17848910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient explicit consideration of tradeoffs in decision making about rectal cancer treatment: benefits for decision process and quality of life.
Pieterse AH; Kunneman M; van den Hout WB; Baas-Thijssen M; Geijsen ED; Ceha HM; Muller KM; van der Linden YM; Marijnen CAM; Stiggelbout AM
Acta Oncol; 2019 Jul; 58(7):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 30971150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance of patient reported and clinical outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and their treating physicians. Do clinicians know what patients want?
van der Valk MJM; van der Sande ME; Toebes RE; Breukink SO; Bröker MEE; Doornebosch PG; Maliko N; Neijenhuis PA; Marinelli AWKS; Peters FP; Peeters KCMJ; Beets GL; Marang-van de Mheen PJ; Hilling DE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1634-1641. PubMed ID: 32336626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preference elicitation tool for abnormal uterine bleeding treatment: a randomized controlled trial.
Hess LM; Litwiller A; Byron J; Stutsman J; Kasper K; Learman LA
Patient; 2015 Apr; 8(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 25074354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Usability and Feasibility of Conjoint Analysis to Elicit Preferences for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients 55 Years and Older.
Shapiro LM; Eppler SL; Baker LC; Harris AS; Gardner MJ; Kamal RN
J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Oct; 44(10):846-852. PubMed ID: 31495523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the treatment tradeoff method in rectal cancer patients: is surgery preference related to outcome utilities?
Bossema ER; Marijnen CA; Baas-Thijssen MC; van de Velde CJ; Stiggelbout AM
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):888-98. PubMed ID: 18519887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complex antithrombotic therapy: determinants of patient preference and impact on medication adherence.
Abraham NS; Naik AD; Street RL; Castillo DL; Deswal A; Richardson PA; Hartman CM; Shelton G; Fraenkel L
Patient Prefer Adherence; 2015; 9():1657-68. PubMed ID: 26640372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment.
Beusterien KM; Dziekan K; Flood E; Harding G; Jordan JC
Value Health; 2005; 8(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 16091022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preferences for outcomes of treatment for rectal cancer: patient and clinician utilities and their application in an interactive computer-based decision aid.
Masya LM; Young JM; Solomon MJ; Harrison JD; Dennis RJ; Salkeld GP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1994-2002. PubMed ID: 19934920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient centered decision making: use of conjoint analysis to determine risk-benefit trade-offs for preference sensitive treatment choices.
Wilson L; Loucks A; Bui C; Gipson G; Zhong L; Schwartzburg A; Crabtree E; Goodin D; Waubant E; McCulloch C
J Neurol Sci; 2014 Sep; 344(1-2):80-7. PubMed ID: 25037284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Web-Based Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Technology in Eliciting Patients' Preferences for Osteoarthritis Treatment.
Al-Omari B; Farhat J; Shraim M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36834057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with adaptive conjoint analysis.
Fraenkel L; Bodardus S; Wittnik DR
Med Care; 2001 Nov; 39(11):1203-16. PubMed ID: 11606874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Considering patient values and treatment preferences enhances patient involvement in rectal cancer treatment decision making.
Kunneman M; Marijnen CA; Baas-Thijssen MC; van der Linden YM; Rozema T; Muller K; Geijsen ED; Stiggelbout AM; Pieterse AH
Radiother Oncol; 2015 Nov; 117(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 26372343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life After Curative Treatment for Rectal Cancer: A Population-Level Study in England.
Downing A; Glaser AW; Finan PJ; Wright P; Thomas JD; Gilbert A; Corner J; Richards M; Morris EJA; Sebag-Montefiore D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Apr; 103(5):1132-1142. PubMed ID: 30553942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient and physician preferences for surgical and adjuvant treatment options for rectal cancer.
Harrison JD; Solomon MJ; Young JM; Meagher A; Butow P; Salkeld G; Hruby G; Clarke S
Arch Surg; 2008 Apr; 143(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 18427027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences.
O'Connor AM; Boyd NF; Warde P; Stolbach L; Till JE
J Chronic Dis; 1987; 40(8):811-8. PubMed ID: 3597681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual Value Clarification Methods Based on Conjoint Analysis: A Systematic Review of Common Practice in Task Design, Statistical Analysis, and Presentation of Results.
Weernink MGM; van Til JA; Witteman HO; Fraenkel L; IJzerman MJ
Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):746-755. PubMed ID: 29592585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient preferences for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: a choice-based conjoint analysis study from Germany.
Hofheinz R; Clouth J; Borchardt-Wagner J; Wagner U; Weidling E; Jen MH; Brück P
BMC Cancer; 2016 Dec; 16(1):937. PubMed ID: 27923357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
