BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20550982)

  • 1. A resistive mesh phantom for assessing the performance of EIT systems.
    Gagnon H; Cousineau M; Adler A; Hartinger AE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Sep; 57(9):2257-66. PubMed ID: 20550982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of EIT system performance.
    Yasin M; Böhm S; Gaggero PO; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):851-65. PubMed ID: 21646713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A data acquisition system for induced current electrical impedance tomography].
    Xiang H; Dong X; Qin M; You F; Shi X; Fu F; Liu R; Ma J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 22(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 16156281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-frequency EIT system with radially symmetric architecture: KHU Mark1.
    Oh TI; Woo EJ; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S183-96. PubMed ID: 17664635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A high frequency electrical impedance tomograph using distributed parallel input channels.
    Jossinet J; Trillaud C; Risacher F; McAdams ET
    Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 8052171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic errors of EIT systems determined by easily-scalable resistive phantoms.
    Hahn G; Just A; Dittmar J; Hellige G
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S163-72. PubMed ID: 18544805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical estimation of resistance/conductance by electrical impedance tomography measurements.
    Demidenko E; Hartov A; Paulsen K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):829-38. PubMed ID: 15250635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of conductivity changes and electrode movements based on EIT temporal sequences.
    Dai T; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S77-88. PubMed ID: 18544802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
    Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A broadband high-frequency electrical impedance tomography system for breast imaging.
    Halter RJ; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):650-9. PubMed ID: 18270001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of anomaly location and size using electrical impedance tomography.
    Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK; Woo EJ; Cho YG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 12617528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for modelling and optimizing an electrical impedance tomography system.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S51-64. PubMed ID: 16636420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a new integrated current source with the modified Howland circuit for EIT applications.
    Hong H; Rahal M; Demosthenous A; Bayford RH
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Oct; 30(10):999-1007. PubMed ID: 19706961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calibration methods for a multi-channel multi-frequency EIT system.
    Oh TI; Lee KH; Kim SM; Koo H; Woo EJ; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1175-88. PubMed ID: 17906386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
    Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance evaluation of five types of Ag/AgCl bio-electrodes for cerebral electrical impedance tomography.
    Xu S; Dai M; Xu C; Chen C; Tang M; Shi X; Dong X
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Jul; 39(7):2059-67. PubMed ID: 21455793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parametric EIT for monitoring cardiac stroke volume.
    Zlochiver S; Freimark D; Arad M; Adunsky A; Abboud S
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S139-46. PubMed ID: 16636406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multi-frequency EIT system design based on telecommunication signal processors.
    Robitaille N; Guardo R; Maurice I; Hartinger AE; Gagnon H
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S57-71. PubMed ID: 19491440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.