232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20550982)
21. [An experimental system of induced-current EIT].
Dong X; You F; Qin M; Shi X; Liu R; Xiang H; Fu F; Cui W
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 21(3):416-9. PubMed ID: 15250146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images.
Khang HS; Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 12166867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new method for electric impedance imaging using an eddy current with a tetrapolar circuit.
Ahsan-Ul-Ambia ; Toda S; Takemae T; Kosugi Y; Hongo M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 56(2):400-6. PubMed ID: 19272885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography system with automatic self-calibration for long-term monitoring.
Wi H; Sohal H; McEwan AL; Woo EJ; Oh TI
IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2014 Feb; 8(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 24681925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of two EIT systems suitable for imaging impedance changes in epilepsy.
Fabrizi L; McEwan A; Oh T; Woo EJ; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S103-20. PubMed ID: 19491447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
Yan W; Hong S; Chaoshi R
Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
Woo EJ; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. EIT reconstructions and Faddeev solutions for a numerically simulated phantom chest.
Mueller JL
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():213-8. PubMed ID: 15133960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine. Part III: Impedance imaging. First section: general concepts and hardware.
Rigaud B; Morucci JP
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1996; 24(4-6):467-597. PubMed ID: 9196886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of weighted frequency-difference EIT using a three-dimensional hemisphere model and phantom.
Ahn S; Oh TI; Jun SC; Seo JK; Woo EJ
Physiol Meas; 2011 Oct; 32(10):1663-80. PubMed ID: 21904022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Experimental justification for using 3D conductivity reconstructions in electrical impedance tomography.
Halter RJ; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S115-27. PubMed ID: 17664629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A new head phantom with realistic shape and spatially varying skull resistivity distribution.
Li JB; Tang C; Dai M; Liu G; Shi XT; Yang B; Xu CH; Fu F; You FS; Tang MX; Dong XZ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Feb; 61(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 24196845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography.
Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Apr; 45(4):486-93. PubMed ID: 9556965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Design and calibration of a compact multi-frequency EIT system for acute stroke imaging.
McEwan A; Romsauerova A; Yerworth R; Horesh L; Bayford R; Holder D
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S199-210. PubMed ID: 16636411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography based on genetic algorithm].
Hou W; Mo Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 20(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 12744177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Low-cost multifrequency electrical impedance-based system (MFEIBS) for clinical imaging: design and performance evaluation.
Singh G; Anand S; Lall B; Srivastava A; Singh V
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):274-289. PubMed ID: 30019971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
