420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20551215)
1. Standardized comparison of antiseptic efficacy of triclosan, PVP-iodine, octenidine dihydrochloride, polyhexanide and chlorhexidine digluconate.
Koburger T; Hübner NO; Braun M; Siebert J; Kramer A
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Aug; 65(8):1712-9. PubMed ID: 20551215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Susceptibility of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant
Dittmann K; Schmidt T; Müller G; Cuny C; Holtfreter S; Troitzsch D; Pfaff P; Hübner NO
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2019; 8():122. PubMed ID: 31367343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposed phase 2/ step 2 in-vitro test on basis of EN 14561 for standardised testing of the wound antiseptics PVP-iodine, chlorhexidine digluconate, polihexanide and octenidine dihydrochloride.
Schedler K; Assadian O; Brautferger U; Müller G; Koburger T; Classen S; Kramer A
BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Feb; 17(1):143. PubMed ID: 28193164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antiseptic Efficacy of Povidone Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Skin Preparation Solutions Used in Burns Surgery.
Smock E; Demertzi E; Abdolrasouli A; Azadian B; Williams G
J Burn Care Res; 2018 Apr; 39(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 29897541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity.
Müller G; Kramer A
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jun; 61(6):1281-7. PubMed ID: 18364400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suprathel-antiseptic matrix: in vitro model for local antiseptic treatment?
Ryssel H; Andreas Radu C; Germann G; Kloeters O; Riedel K; Otte M; Kremer T
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2011 Feb; 24(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 21242734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Octenidine dihydrochloride, a modern antiseptic for skin, mucous membranes and wounds.
Hübner NO; Siebert J; Kramer A
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2010; 23(5):244-58. PubMed ID: 20484966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The antimicrobial effect of acetic acid--an alternative to common local antiseptics?
Ryssel H; Kloeters O; Germann G; Schäfer T; Wiedemann G; Oehlbauer M
Burns; 2009 Aug; 35(5):695-700. PubMed ID: 19286325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a surface test.
Block C; Robenshtok E; Simhon A; Shapiro M
J Hosp Infect; 2000 Oct; 46(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 11049709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anti-Biofilm Effect of Octenidine and Polyhexanide on Uropathogenic Biofilm-Producing Bacteria.
Loose M; Naber KG; Purcell L; Wirth MP; Wagenlehner FME
Urol Int; 2021; 105(3-4):278-284. PubMed ID: 33401282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimicrobial efficacy of 3 oral antiseptics containing octenidine, polyhexamethylene biguanide, or Citroxx: can chlorhexidine be replaced?
Rohrer N; Widmer AF; Waltimo T; Kulik EM; Weiger R; Filipuzzi-Jenny E; Walter C
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 31(7):733-9. PubMed ID: 20518635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A standardized test to assess the impact of different organic challenges on the antimicrobial activity of antiseptics.
Pitten FA; Werner HP; Kramer A
J Hosp Infect; 2003 Oct; 55(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 14529634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Activity of the antiseptic polyhexanide against gram-negative bacteria.
Fabry WH; Kock HJ; Vahlensieck W
Microb Drug Resist; 2014 Apr; 20(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 24192397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial efficacy of eucalyptus oil and 1,8-cineole alone and in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate against microorganisms grown in planktonic and biofilm cultures.
Hendry ER; Worthington T; Conway BR; Lambert PA
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Dec; 64(6):1219-25. PubMed ID: 19837714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Addressing the challenges in antisepsis: focus on povidone iodine.
Barreto R; Barrois B; Lambert J; Malhotra-Kumar S; Santos-Fernandes V; Monstrey S
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2020 Sep; 56(3):106064. PubMed ID: 32599228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction to: Susceptibility of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) to chlorhexidine digluconate, octenidine dihydrochloride, polyhexanide, PVP-iodine and triclosan in comparison to hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) and community-aquired MRSA (CA-MRSA): a standardized comparison.
Dittmann K; Schmidt T; Müller G; Cuny C; Holtfreter S; Troitzsch D; Pfaff P; Hübner NO
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2019; 8():184. PubMed ID: 31832184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antiseptic effect of a novel alcohol-free mouthwash: a convenient prophylactic alternative for high-risk patients.
Bahna P; Hanna HA; Dvorak T; Vaporciyan A; Chambers M; Raad I
Oral Oncol; 2007 Feb; 43(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16798063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Residual antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine digluconate and octenidine dihydrochloride on reconstructed human epidermis.
Müller G; Langer J; Siebert J; Kramer A
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2014; 27(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 23887383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection for high-level resistance by chronic triclosan exposure is not universal.
McBain AJ; Ledder RG; Sreenivasan P; Gilbert P
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 May; 53(5):772-7. PubMed ID: 15117935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cationic compounds with activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria: interest of a new compound compared with two older antiseptics, hexamidine and chlorhexidine.
Grare M; Dibama HM; Lafosse S; Ribon A; Mourer M; Regnouf-de-Vains JB; Finance C; Duval RE
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2010 May; 16(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 19456831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
