These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Prior knowledge: the effects of natural category size on memory for implicitly encoded concepts. Nelson DL; Bajo MT; McEvoy CL; Schreiber TA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):957-67. PubMed ID: 2528608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test? Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks. McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paradoxical effects of testing: repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall. McDermott KB Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 16752590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Representational change and analogy: how analogical inferences alter target representations. Blanchette I; Dunbar K J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):672-85. PubMed ID: 12109761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recall and recognition measures of paired associate learning in healthy aging. Lowndes GJ; Saling MM; Ames D; Chiu E; Gonzalez LM; Savage G Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Jul; 15(4):506-22. PubMed ID: 18584342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both? Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs. Gullick MM; Juhasz BJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 18609409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reactivation of associated information affects source monitoring. Ball BH; Marsh RL; Meeks JT; Hicks JL Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):818-26. PubMed ID: 21286898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conjunction errors and semantic transparency. Wong M; Rotello CM Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19966238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can deja vu result from similarity to a prior experience? Support for the similarity hypothesis of deja vu. Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Nomi JS Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1082-8. PubMed ID: 19966259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation. Rickard TC; Bajic D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrieval-induced forgetting and mental imagery. Saunders J; Fernandes M; Kosnes L Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):819-28. PubMed ID: 19679861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attempting to avoid false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm: assessing the combined influence of practice and warnings in young and old adults. Watson JM; McDermott KB; Balota DA Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 15078050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semantic and subword priming during binocular suppression. Costello P; Jiang Y; Baartman B; McGlennen K; He S Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 19286396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]